From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:41419 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754334AbaHUMID (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:08:03 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r10so13501613pdi.6 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ako (pl398.nas931.p-kanagawa.nttpc.ne.jp. [219.102.77.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dn3sm25317494pbc.79.2014.08.21.05.08.01 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:08:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Naohiro Aota To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: Do not free dirty extent buffer Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 21:07:58 +0900 Message-ID: <87mway82qp.fsf@elisp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: free_some_buffer() should not free dirty extent buffers. They should be left for later commit. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota --- extent_io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/extent_io.c b/extent_io.c index a127e54..8a668be 100644 --- a/extent_io.c +++ b/extent_io.c @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static int free_some_buffers(struct extent_io_tree *tree) list_for_each_safe(node, next, &tree->lru) { eb = list_entry(node, struct extent_buffer, lru); - if (eb->refs == 1) { + if (eb->refs == 1 && !(eb->flags && EXTENT_DIRTY)) { free_extent_buffer(eb); if (tree->cache_size < cache_hard_max) break; -- 2.0.4