Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs-progs: add block-group-tree to the default mkfs/convert features

[Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 787 bytes --]

Hi Qu,

Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> writes:

> [CHANGELOG]
> v2:
> - Automatically remove bgt feature when dependent feature is missing
>   Instead of erroring out. This will allow us to run the existing
>   no-holes/v1 free space cache test cases without any modification.
>
> I was planning to do this during v6.12 but forgot it and now the next
> LTS kernel release is not that far away, it's finally time to make the
> switch.
>

Does this also mean that block-group-tree is considered recommended and
production-ready for users of linux-6.12 LTS, or that it will only be
recommended for the next LTS kernel series?

Also, are there any known disadvantages that result from having used
btrfstune compared with a pristine FS created with
mkfs.btrfs -O block-group-tree ?

Best,
Nicholas

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 861 bytes --]