From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:55960 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750729AbdJNXDB (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 14 Oct 2017 19:03:01 -0400
Received: by mail-pg0-f68.google.com with SMTP id b11so3940112pgn.12
        for <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 14 Oct 2017 16:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 08:02:53 +0900
Message-ID: <87tvz19vtu.wl-satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
From: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
To: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] btrfs-progs: allow "no" to disable compression for convenience
In-Reply-To: <ortddp$skc$1@blaine.gmane.org>
References: <87po9p7uu9.wl-satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
        <ortddp$skc$1@blaine.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

At Sat, 14 Oct 2017 18:19:14 +0200,
Koen Kooi wrote:
> 
> Op 14-10-17 om 14:54 schreef Satoru Takeuchi:
> > It's messy to use "" to disable compression. Introduce the new value "no"
> > which can also be used for this purpose.
> 
> Wouldn't 'none' be a better fit?

I consider "no" is better because we use `nocompress` or `compress=no`
mount option to disable compression. I want to unify the expression.

Thanks,
Satoru

> 
> regards,
> 
> Koen
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html