From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0)
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 15:00:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8928893.KSgCgv7lUQ@merkaba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan$2b9aa$a4dca8a2$fc1e4ebe$a8fffbe3@cox.net>
Hello Duncan.
Duncan - 09.07.17, 11:17:
> Paul Jones posted on Sun, 09 Jul 2017 09:16:36 +0000 as excerpted:
> >> Marc MERLIN - 08.07.17, 21:34:
> >> > This is now the 3rd filesystem I have (on 3 different machines) that
> >> > is getting corruption of some kind (on 4.11.6).
> >>
> >> Anyone else getting corruptions with 4.11?
> >>
> >> I happily switch back to 4.10.17 or even 4.9 if that is the case. I may
> >> even do so just from your reports. Well, yes, I will do exactly that. I
> >> just switch back for 4.10 for now. Better be safe, than sorry.
> >
> > No corruption for me - I've been on 4.11 since about .2 and everything
> > seems fine. Currently on 4.11.8
>
> No corruptions here either. 4.12.0 now, previously 4.12-rc5(ish, git),
> before that 4.11.0.
>
> I have however just upgraded to new ssds then wiped and setup the old
[…]
> Also, all my btrfs are raid1 or dup for checksummed redundancy, and
> relatively small, the largest now 80 GiB per device, after the upgrade.
> And my use-case doesn't involve snapshots or subvolumes.
>
> So any bug that is most likely on older filesystems, say those without
> the no-holes feature, for instance, or that doesn't tend to hit raid1 or
> dup mode, or that is less likely on small filesystems on fast ssds, or
> that triggers most often with reflinks and thus on filesystems with
> snapshots, is unlikely to hit me.
Hmmm, the BTRFS filesystems on my laptop 3 to 5 or even more years old. I stick
with 4.10 for now, I think.
The older ones are RAID 1 across two SSDs, the newer one is single device, on
one SSD.
These filesystems didn´t fail me in years and since 4.5 or 4.6 even the "I
search for free space" kernel hang (hung tasks and all that) is gone as well.
Thanks,
--
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-09 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-20 14:39 4.11.3: BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to add free space :-17 => btrfs check --repair runs clean Marc MERLIN
2017-06-20 15:23 ` Hugo Mills
2017-06-20 15:26 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-20 15:36 ` Hugo Mills
2017-06-20 15:44 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-20 23:12 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-20 23:58 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-21 3:31 ` Chris Murphy
2017-06-21 3:43 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-21 15:13 ` How to fix errors that check --mode lomem finds, but --mode normal doesn't? Marc MERLIN
2017-06-21 23:22 ` Chris Murphy
2017-06-22 0:48 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-22 2:22 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-06-22 2:53 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-22 4:08 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-06-23 4:06 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-23 8:54 ` Lu Fengqi
2017-06-23 16:17 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-24 2:34 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-26 10:46 ` Lu Fengqi
2017-06-27 23:11 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-28 7:10 ` Lu Fengqi
2017-06-28 14:43 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-01 17:06 ` 4.11 relocate crash, null pointer Marc MERLIN
2017-05-01 18:08 ` 4.11 relocate crash, null pointer + rolling back a filesystem by X hours? Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 1:50 ` Chris Murphy
2017-05-02 3:23 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 4:56 ` Chris Murphy
2017-05-02 5:11 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 18:47 ` btrfs check --repair: failed to repair damaged filesystem, aborting Marc MERLIN
2017-05-03 6:00 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-03 6:17 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-03 6:32 ` Roman Mamedov
2017-05-03 20:40 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-07-07 5:37 ` ctree.c:197: update_ref_for_cow: BUG_ON `ret` triggered, value -5 Marc MERLIN
2017-07-07 5:39 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-07-07 9:33 ` Lu Fengqi
2017-07-07 16:38 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-07-09 4:34 ` 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0) Marc MERLIN
2017-07-09 5:05 ` We really need a better/working btrfs check --repair Marc MERLIN
2017-07-09 6:34 ` 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0) Marc MERLIN
2017-07-09 7:57 ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-07-09 9:16 ` Paul Jones
2017-07-09 11:17 ` Duncan
2017-07-09 13:00 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2017-07-29 19:29 ` Imran Geriskovan
2017-07-29 23:38 ` Duncan
2017-07-30 14:54 ` Imran Geriskovan
2017-07-31 4:53 ` Duncan
2017-07-31 20:32 ` Imran Geriskovan
2017-08-01 1:36 ` Duncan
2017-08-01 15:18 ` Imran Geriskovan
2017-07-31 21:07 ` Ivan Sizov
2017-07-31 21:17 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-07-31 21:39 ` Ivan Sizov
2017-08-01 16:41 ` Ivan Sizov
2017-07-31 22:00 ` Justin Maggard
2017-08-01 6:38 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-02 19:59 ` 4.11 relocate crash, null pointer + rolling back a filesystem by X hours? Kai Krakow
2017-05-02 5:01 ` Duncan
2017-05-02 19:53 ` Kai Krakow
2017-05-23 16:58 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-24 10:16 ` Duncan
2017-05-05 1:19 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-05 2:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-05 2:40 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-05 5:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-05-05 15:43 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-05-17 18:23 ` Kai Krakow
2017-05-05 1:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-06-29 13:36 ` How to fix errors that check --mode lomem finds, but --mode normal doesn't? Lu Fengqi
2017-06-29 15:30 ` Marc MERLIN
2017-06-30 14:59 ` Lu Fengqi
2017-06-22 4:08 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-06-21 12:04 ` 4.11.3: BTRFS critical (device dm-1): unable to add free space :-17 => btrfs check --repair runs clean Duncan
2017-06-21 3:26 ` Chris Murphy
2017-06-21 4:06 ` Marc MERLIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8928893.KSgCgv7lUQ@merkaba \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).