From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD88C433FE for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2022 05:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233430AbiDQFRl (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Apr 2022 01:17:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41320 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233425AbiDQFRj (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Apr 2022 01:17:39 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3684EE0D0; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 22:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id r66so13474953pgr.3; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 22:15:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bj6euzA7DWSefgUbpzS1LfvhC/KobqXjsuL9e8GbpVs=; b=byKFwQgnQiFHv/Stsp9HRyqovOxd4jd0VbbwXYhnzTqV5D6LBZdmxJy+aqYNuJUwNH e8xstuw5vE53dh94yS4o9yRT/C57FXVs5l1iGsY4F+x9k4I5IULf0CQ4+df67hAw5yUd UAzsU4zKgSuc02i5G+/O7ljgjQyzemEW59vXNq9a0FyGYqS03x+cFdLKLsXSRGK4XDL6 FqAcUQr9CUTL43EsokSSA3Q2Xfldo14Vya8vhql9L/jXt+66VXwZW4pd56waxUeCac3U moWFb8VAP3gBmO+puiu3/PCmsrJvq0TiQTcBIgkOl5b7J45frrtnWzCpXrmCmj6LvMeg cppA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bj6euzA7DWSefgUbpzS1LfvhC/KobqXjsuL9e8GbpVs=; b=CXfrIDvIXa4XBc84ncfcQTJgKZJWeG+/sehRM9rM++vmSK9XSnJxdXfbL4TT7Gejhq 1legGLBnPeNkPnsNRVDCVqUgdVB+TeZm/gCJT2mhq6oYUQd2JqNNTA1LfKcfUifWSWk9 EFPKt9j0G9OKttzNHYf20c687QUkLWVCgk8hyRLa8okTpwrrYOtNdUc12jh3EBM7O8hd HO6p8pWPihseTONJ8ryyK1to6k2oq0ZVacKEh33oxnrVis6aAn6bdtxnK16k85kLV5f4 JOhQ8UOv2xmgEdfbJFE5++0S7InJ4tlhmqbHemkzn//7MFQlw1L7J0wKxAZDF/3mnI6c ylRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321w0KcCKq09MO+lE4f/kVDrnAW9HI8F4JC+/ItWZ0TgJUB6+TF 27t2CR/eZsqieKgImsjvkpk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbYDPCVeRb6S1Zxw8PcQ1E/8iBjW6mF5pmQWDZ/KgNK1nlAGTtRLh+3Z4VSVbFn3FQ9O/YuA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:f743:0:b0:3a6:6786:30b1 with SMTP id f3-20020a63f743000000b003a6678630b1mr3813576pgk.243.1650172504522; Sat, 16 Apr 2022 22:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs03-180-214-233-9.three.co.id. [180.214.233.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p8-20020aa78608000000b005082c3cbfd2sm7477399pfn.218.2022.04.16.22.15.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Apr 2022 22:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a0524b2-dc76-ff96-4304-b1f8ae574e9b@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 12:14:59 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: zstd: add missing function name in zstd_reclaim_timer_fn() comment Content-Language: en-US To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Nick Terrell , Schspa Shi , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220416081534.28729-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 4/17/22 10:16, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 03:15:34PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> kernel test robot reports kernel-doc warning: >> >>>> fs/btrfs/zstd.c:98: warning: This comment starts with '/**', but >> isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst > > This is the wrong fix. Static functions should not have kernel-doc > comments. Just delete the second '*' at the head of the comment. > > Also, btrfs developers should be testing with W=1. That will catch > these problems before the code is integrated. Oops, thanks for reminding me. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara