From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: <fdmanana@gmail.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] Btrfs, updates for 4.12
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 13:26:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90cd8455-c226-799e-bab3-3d55b59d3db3@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H6dNZ1SShz6iaHYeqMQ+PCAKPzetMuRm+8MVA-8h2E0MA@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/26/2017 11:06 AM, Filipe Manana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you actually ran xfstests with those readahead patches to
> preallocate radix tree nodes?
>
> With those 2 patches applied (Chris' for-linus.4,12 branch) this
> breaks things and many btrfs specific tests (at least, since I can't
> get pass them) result in tons of traces like the following in a debug
> kernel:
>
> [ 8180.696804] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> mm/slab.h:432
> [ 8180.703584] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 28583, name: btrfs
> [ 8180.724146] 2 locks held by btrfs/28583:
> [ 8180.726427] #0: (sb_writers#12){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff811c1e33>]
> mnt_want_write_file+0x25/0x4d
> [ 8180.736742] #1: (&(&fs_info->reada_lock)->rlock){+.+.+.}, at:
> [<ffffffffa02306eb>] reada_add_block+0x2fe/0x6cd [btrfs]
> [ 8180.766321] Preemption disabled at:
> [ 8180.766326] [<ffffffff8107ac54>] preempt_count_add+0x65/0x68
> [ 8180.794837] CPU: 5 PID: 28583 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W
> 4.11.0-rc8-btrfs-next-39+ #1
> [ 8180.798818] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
> [ 8180.798818] Call Trace:
> [ 8180.798818] dump_stack+0x68/0x92
> [ 8180.798818] ? preempt_count_add+0x65/0x68
> [ 8180.798818] ___might_sleep+0x20f/0x226
> [ 8180.798818] __might_sleep+0x77/0x7e
> [ 8180.798818] slab_pre_alloc_hook+0x32/0x4f
> [ 8180.798818] kmem_cache_alloc+0x39/0x233
> [ 8180.798818] ? radix_tree_node_alloc.constprop.12+0x9d/0xdf
> [ 8180.798818] radix_tree_node_alloc.constprop.12+0x9d/0xdf
> [ 8180.798818] __radix_tree_create+0xc3/0x143
> [ 8180.798818] __radix_tree_insert+0x32/0xc0
> [ 8180.798818] reada_add_block+0x318/0x6cd [btrfs]
So radix_tree_preload doesn't work the way I thought it did. It populates a
per-cpu pool of radix tree nodes so the allocation is sure not to fail.
But, when we go to actually allocate the node during radix_tree_insert:
static struct radix_tree_node *
radix_tree_node_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, struct radix_tree_node *parent,
struct radix_tree_root *root,
unsigned int shift, unsigned int offset,
unsigned int count, unsigned int exceptional)
{
struct radix_tree_node *ret = NULL;
/*
* Preload code isn't irq safe and it doesn't make sense to use
* preloading during an interrupt anyway as all the allocations have
* to be atomic. So just do normal allocation when in interrupt.
*/
if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask) && !in_interrupt()) {
struct radix_tree_preload *rtp;
/*
* Even if the caller has preloaded, try to allocate from the
* cache first for the new node to get accounted to the memory
* cgroup.
*/
ret = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep,
gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (ret)
goto out;
/*
* Provided the caller has preloaded here, we will always
* succeed in getting a node here (and never reach
* kmem_cache_alloc)
*/
rtp = this_cpu_ptr(&radix_tree_preloads);
if (rtp->nr) {
ret = rtp->nodes;
rtp->nodes = ret->parent;
rtp->nr--;
}
/*
* Update the allocation stack trace as this is more useful
* for debugging.
*/
kmemleak_update_trace(ret);
goto out;
}
ret = kmem_cache_alloc(radix_tree_node_cachep, gfp_mask);
We only jump into the preload pool if our gfp_mask for the root doesn't
allow blocking. And even if we don't allow blocking we'll still hit the
pool as a last resort.
So I think the right answer is to keep the sleeping flag off the root and
also keep the preload GFP_KERNEL.
-chris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-26 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-19 11:35 [PULL] Btrfs, updates for 4.12 David Sterba
2017-04-26 15:06 ` Filipe Manana
2017-04-26 15:12 ` Chris Mason
2017-04-26 16:08 ` David Sterba
2017-04-26 17:26 ` Chris Mason [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90cd8455-c226-799e-bab3-3d55b59d3db3@fb.com \
--to=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).