From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Nicol Subject: Re: BUG: Link from sub volume, then remove the subvolume -> wrong link Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:31:51 -0600 Message-ID: <934f64a20912150931q46aea2eer12bc907ecb0137fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <200912112054.25986.kreijack@libero.it> <4B22E2D8.7020706@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B23E378.1090905@mit.edu> <4B257BF4.5060807@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B26D504.3080201@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B270ABE.5090109@myrealbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B270ABE.5090109@myrealbox.com> List-ID: how about supporting the operation, as a feature, and allowing a file to be in two different subvolumes at the same time? Would that make the link semantics too confusing? -- Is it the time when there isn't time to discuss but there is time to act yet?