From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: wqu@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] btrfs: add support for SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID in btrfs.ko
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:58:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <939c1f2d-1858-7b8e-9ad8-3e23937550d5@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23789f5a-e572-a1ae-52ae-263fc2fc3aeb@gmx.com>
On 01/08/2018 01:25 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年01月08日 13:13, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/08/2018 01:08 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018年01月08日 13:04, Anand Jain wrote:
>>>> Userland sets SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID and resets it only when changing
>>>> fsid is complete. Its not a good idea to mount the device anything in
>>>> between, so this patch fails the mount if SB SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID
>>>> is set.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>>>> cc: wqu@suse.com
>>>> ---
>>>> v1->v2: Oops. Fix cut and paste error, remove ~. My bad.
>>>>
>>>> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>> include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h | 1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>>> index a69e5944dc08..0dd215258ff9 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>>>> @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@
>>>> BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC |\
>>>> BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_ERROR |\
>>>> BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SEEDING |\
>>>> - BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP)
>>>> + BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP |\
>>>> + BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID)
>>>
>>> Still the same problem here.
>>>
>>> Since that super flag is excluded in btrfs_check_super_valid(), I didn't
>>> see any meaning including it into BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SUPP, and it will
>>> confuse later BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SUPP users.
>>
>>
>> Anyway BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SUPP as such does not stop to mount, it
>> just warns. So when there is a new flag which is not supported
>> we get this warning. As in the case with BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP_V2.
>> BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP_V2 in kernel is defined but not supported.
>> However since we are supporting BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID, so
>> adding to BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SUPP make sense to me. ?
>
> We still refuse to mount the fs if CHANGING_FSID is set, which I believe
> should be called "unsupported"
>
> On the other hand it would be better to include METADUMP_V2 into SUPP,
> as we allow it to be mounted and now kernel knows that flag, output a
> warning doesn't seems necessary now.
>
> It would be even better to change the later SUPP flags checks, into
> something not only output some meaningless numeric flags, but also
> output the human readable flags if it's recognized but unsupported. (For
> CHANGIND_FSID).
Originally [1] looks like there isn't any design specific reason not to
fail the mount (which I didn't want to alter to fail) but just to warn.
Will change it to fail.
[1]
commit 319e4d0661e5323c9f9945f0f8fb5905e5fe74c3
btrfs: Enhance super validation check
Thanks, Anand
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>>
>> Thanks, Anand
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Qu
>>>
>>>> static const struct extent_io_ops btree_extent_io_ops;
>>>> static void end_workqueue_fn(struct btrfs_work *work);
>>>> @@ -3906,6 +3907,10 @@ static int btrfs_check_super_valid(struct
>>>> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>>>> btrfs_err(fs_info, "no valid FS found");
>>>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>> + if (btrfs_super_flags(sb) & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID) {
>>>> + btrfs_err(fs_info, "SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID is set");
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> if (btrfs_super_flags(sb) & ~BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SUPP)
>>>> btrfs_warn(fs_info, "unrecognized super flag: %llu",
>>>> btrfs_super_flags(sb) & ~BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SUPP);
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
>>>> b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
>>>> index 38ab0e06259a..aff1356c2bb8 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/btrfs_tree.h
>>>> @@ -457,6 +457,7 @@ struct btrfs_free_space_header {
>>>> #define BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_SEEDING (1ULL << 32)
>>>> #define BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP (1ULL << 33)
>>>> #define BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP_V2 (1ULL << 34)
>>>> +#define BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID (1ULL << 35)
>>>> /*
>>>>
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-08 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 3:05 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add missing BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG define Anand Jain
2018-01-08 3:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: add support for SUPER_FLAG_CHANGING_FSID in btrfs.ko Anand Jain
2018-01-08 4:55 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-08 5:05 ` Anand Jain
2018-01-08 5:10 ` Anand Jain
2018-01-08 5:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Anand Jain
2018-01-08 5:08 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-08 5:13 ` Anand Jain
2018-01-08 5:25 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-08 5:58 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2018-01-08 7:50 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-08 4:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add missing BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG define Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=939c1f2d-1858-7b8e-9ad8-3e23937550d5@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).