From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bug? fstrim only trims unallocated space, not unused in bg's
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:40:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94ecb41f-e825-97ce-999d-020a5abffccd@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bbab87ad-b84e-2bca-5d90-47a77abd295d@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2122 bytes --]
On 11/20/17 3:01 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> On 11/20/17 3:00 PM, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>> On 11/19/17 4:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 19.11.2017 09:17, Chris Murphy пишет:
>>>>> fstrim should trim free space, but it only trims unallocated. This is
>>>>> with kernel 4.14.0 and the entire 4.13 series. I'm pretty sure it
>>>>> behaved this way with 4.12 also.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, I was told it should also trim free space ...
>>>>
>>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg61819.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> It definitely isn't. If I do a partial balance, then fstrim, I get a
>>> larger trimmed value, corresponding exactly to unallocated space.
>>
>>
>> I've just tested with 4.14 and it definitely trims within block groups.
>
> Derp. This should read 4.12.
>
>> I've attached my test script and the log of the run. I'll build and
>> test a 4.14 kernel and see if I can reproduce there. It may well be
>> that we're just misreporting the bytes trimmed.
I get the same results on v4.14. I wrote up a little script to parse
the btrfs-debug-tree extent tree dump and the discards that are issued
after the final sync (when the tree is dumped) match.
The script output is also as expected:
/mnt2: 95.1 GiB (102082281472 bytes) trimmed
# remove every other 100MB file, totalling 1.5 GB
+ sync
+ killall blktrace
+ wait
+ echo 'after sync'
+ sleep 1
+ btrace -a discard /dev/loop0
+ fstrim -v /mnt2
/mnt2: 96.6 GiB (103659962368 bytes) trimmed
One thing that may not be apparent is that the byte count is from the
device(s)'s perspective. If you have a file system with duplicate
chunks or a redundant RAID mode, the numbers will reflect that.
The total byte count should be correct as well. It's the total number
of bytes that we submit for discard and that were accepted by the block
layer.
Do you have a test case that shows it being wrong and can you provide
the blktrace capture of the device(s) while the fstrim is running?
-Jeff
--
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-19 6:17 bug? fstrim only trims unallocated space, not unused in bg's Chris Murphy
2017-11-19 6:27 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2017-11-19 21:38 ` Chris Murphy
[not found] ` <3114a78e-485a-daea-f8b1-48cc330f4209@suse.com>
2017-11-20 20:01 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-11-20 20:40 ` Jeff Mahoney [this message]
2017-11-20 21:56 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-20 22:59 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 1:46 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-11-21 4:04 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 4:13 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-11-21 4:15 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-20 2:13 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-20 2:24 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-20 2:30 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-20 2:42 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-20 22:23 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 1:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-21 4:06 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 4:09 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 4:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-21 4:34 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 4:43 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-21 4:46 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 4:49 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 4:58 ` Qu Wenruo
2017-11-21 5:58 ` Chris Murphy
2017-11-21 6:10 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-04-01 3:28 ` Chris Murphy
2018-04-01 10:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-04-01 23:30 ` Chris Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94ecb41f-e825-97ce-999d-020a5abffccd@suse.com \
--to=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox