From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs: fix 006 adds _runnt_btrfs_util_prog()
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:34:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98fc270c-cd74-23cb-7bd6-b02ff75a7b91@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160623111843.GL3226@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On 06/23/2016 07:18 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 07:03:59PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/23/2016 06:53 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> [snip]
>>>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
>>>> index a44fb8750220..2a10fbb2d341 100644
>>>> --- a/common/rc
>>>> +++ b/common/rc
>>>> @@ -3114,6 +3114,17 @@ _min_dio_alignment()
>>>> fi
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +run_check_dontfail()
>>>> +{
>>>> + echo "# $@" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>>>> + "$@" >> $seqres.full 2>&1 || echo "failed: '$@'"
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +_runnt_btrfs_util_prog()
>>>> +{
>>>> + run_check_dontfail $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG $*
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> run_check()
>>>> {
>>>> echo "# $@" >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>>>> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/006 b/tests/btrfs/006
>>>> index 715fd80fb6fc..9d1fe09e07de 100755
>>>> --- a/tests/btrfs/006
>>>> +++ b/tests/btrfs/006
>>>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ echo "== Show filesystem by UUID"
>>>> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem show $UUID | _filter_btrfs_filesystem_show $TOTAL_DEVS $UUID
>>>>
>>>> echo "== Sync filesystem"
>>>> -$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch
>>>> +_runnt_btrfs_util_prog filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT
>>>
>>> Still, I don't think this helper is necessary.
>>>
>>> $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT >/dev/null
>>>
>>> doesn't _fail on failure, output error messages breaks golden image, and
>>> is much simpler. Do I miss anything?
>>
>> runnt_btrfs_util_prog() checks the return status of the command,
>> if failed (!0) it will echo so to break the golden image.
>
> So it fails silently now? (return non-zero value and print no error
> message) That seems a btrfs-progs bug to me.. It should print error
> messages to stderr on failure, so we don't have to check the return
> value explicitly.
For programming interfaces I would rather depend more on the return
value, than the UI/error strings.
Thanks, Anand
> Thanks,
> Eryu
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-23 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-23 10:37 [PATCH v2] fstests: btrfs: fix 006 adds _runnt_btrfs_util_prog() Anand Jain
2016-06-23 10:53 ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-23 11:03 ` Anand Jain
2016-06-23 11:18 ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-23 11:34 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2016-06-23 11:54 ` Filipe Manana
2016-06-23 11:59 ` Anand Jain
2016-06-23 12:11 ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-23 12:24 ` Anand Jain
2016-06-23 13:17 ` [PATCH v3] fstests: btrfs: fix 006 Anand Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98fc270c-cd74-23cb-7bd6-b02ff75a7b91@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).