linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@inwind.it>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
	Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Cc: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>,
	Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-btrfs.rules and degraded boot
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:07:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99221c4e-0ab4-43c7-8b47-b4fd7ff0c35d@inwind.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtTVKA0DEqDhDDduTMMONo7XUrGD-VaDt2Zfsg_mqP762Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 2016-07-06 20:57, Chris Murphy wrote:
[...]
> 
> Seems like we need more granularity by btrfs ioctl for device ready,
> e.g. some way to indicate:
> 
> 0 all devices ready
> 1 devices not ready (don't even try to mount)
> 2 minimum devices ready (degraded mount possible)
> 
> 
> Btrfs multiple device single and raid0 only return code 0 or 1. Where
> raid 1, 5, 6 could return code 2. The systemd default policy for code
> 2 could be to wait some amount of time to see if state goes to 0. At
> the timeout, try to mount anyway. If rootflags=degraded, it mounts. If
> not, mount fails, and we get a dracut prompt.
> 

Pay attention that to return 2, you have to scan all the VGs to check if all the involved devices are available: i.e. a filesystem composed by 5 disks, may have a VG RAID5 with only 3 disks used for data, and a VG RAID1 for metadata for the other two disks....

Think to try to perform this for each disk appearing.... I fear that it is too expensive


> That's better behavior than now.
> 
>> Equivalent of this rule is required under systemd and desired in
>> general to avoid polling. On systemd list I outlined possible
>> alternative implementation as systemd service instead of really
>> hackish udev rule.
> 
> I'll go read it there. Thanks.
> 
> 


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-07 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-05 18:53 64-btrfs.rules and degraded boot Chris Murphy
2016-07-05 19:27 ` Kai Krakow
2016-07-05 19:30   ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-05 20:10     ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06  9:51       ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 11:45         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-06 11:55           ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 12:14             ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-06 12:39               ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 12:48                 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 16:52                   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-07 18:23                     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 18:58                       ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 19:14                         ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 19:59                         ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 20:20                           ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-08 12:24                             ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-11 21:07                               ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-12 15:34                                 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 20:13                         ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-07 19:41                       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-06 12:49             ` Tomasz Torcz
2016-07-06 17:19         ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06 18:04           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-06 18:23             ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06 18:29               ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 19:17               ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-06 20:00                 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 17:00                   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-06 18:24           ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 18:57             ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 17:07               ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2016-07-07 16:37 ` Goffredo Baroncelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99221c4e-0ab4-43c7-8b47-b4fd7ff0c35d@inwind.it \
    --to=kreijack@inwind.it \
    --cc=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
    --cc=hurikhan77@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).