From: Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@gmail.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fsck: disable --init-extent-tree option when using snapshots
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 21:36:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6AEEF-1B52-449E-BB89-B3619EE968EB@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <531E657A.2000803@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hi Josef,
Just ping this again.
Did you have any good ideas to rebuild extent tree if broken filesystem
is filled with snapshots.?
I was working on this recently, i was blocked that i can not verify if an extent
is *FULL BACKREF* mode or not. As a *FULL BACKREF* extent's refs can be 1
and more than 1..
I am willing to test codes or have a try if you could give me some advice etc.
-Wang
> On 03/10/2014 11:50 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/10/2014 08:12 AM, Shilong Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Josef,
>>>
>>> As i haven't thought any better ideas to rebuild extent tree which
>>> contains extent that owns 'FULL BACKREF' flag.
>>>
>>> Considering an extent's refs can be equal or more than 1 if this
>>> extent has *FULL BACKREF* flag, so we could not make sure an
>>> extent's flag by only searching fs/file tree any more.
>>>
>>> So until now, i just disable this option if snapshots exists,
>>> please correct me if i miss something here. Or you have any better
>>> ideas to solve this problem.~_~
>>>
>>>
>> I thought the fsck stuff rebuilds full backref refs properly, does it
>> not? If it doesn't we need to fix that, however I'm fine with
>> disabling the option if snapshots exist for the time being. Thanks,
> If there are no snapshots, --init-extent-tree can works as expected.
> I just have not thought a better idea to rebuild extent tree if we do have
> snapshots which means we may have an extent with *FULL BACKREF*
> flag.
>
> Thanks,
> Wang
>>
>> Josef
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTHd9NAAoJEANb+wAKly3BYCYP/0iTaaa7w0SnfXtgjoVyX+nT
>> +e0Pa46zeKzpTujotCDb9E/2PBesCAvA4Psog3rkfsqJ2nXN9cERN4E6/JG4nAHh
>> Hv4KPo+w+tCkC4U2wSoDivYrVk9G5SH25ewkgW6iheSYNIlm+PLbOQz9DzGjCFDp
>> 51J9tG5E010siOyhlLCyGj8ZTj+gXuoQVWKCS8dOpCLMrbYYjMDXa562hqWaLoS/
>> t3eSfP7Tnnpl43NiMZI4fWrzmlFa5lba5iJmG59FeyiseRH4Zrhee4St1L1xDL5A
>> /6f3tJJT7DJjRRJFv0nJAOvOPyFaK8bMaYmOQJg6VrhcyPKM3BxBVEab3HrmQ7jt
>> LCMWobpIcM7e5BugmbTGGsFymhv05SQgvYGzpzRVXdsSzqubuqTcXwloNU5RyyFF
>> sXT9IiW9wAibHe7mDN7V6nfo1bVfHsjvSVi1rqz4/zFOWyh8oqxfEhxUJIWhfFsn
>> j0WJevvqKnjBJujyyuQpL13tzh69qei0AHOEme3R46BSRMnyuacy/WOeyo4VXPcn
>> 0GIeWbngAIWF/quhoQGkvofRMlPgftiDge8uz9pbm3IEKeiP9dQ/HvKsIHMKjnKW
>> 3dEBvMV/CSUQNek4VjO1ALefTRZQvJVL8Wxdij4W+djJw/uVX7fOhuqdkqyfM3FY
>> CKSB3HUSUtDCammsvgQA
>> =OT98
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-12 15:18 3.14.0-rc3: btrfs send/receive blocks btrfs IO on other devices (near deadlocks) Marc MERLIN
2014-03-10 10:39 ` [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fsck: disable --init-extent-tree option when using snapshots Wang Shilong
2014-03-10 12:12 ` Shilong Wang
2014-03-10 15:50 ` Josef Bacik
2014-03-11 1:23 ` Wang Shilong
2014-03-08 21:53 ` send/receive locking Hugo Mills
2014-03-08 21:55 ` Josef Bacik
2014-03-08 22:00 ` Hugo Mills
2014-03-08 22:02 ` Josef Bacik
2014-03-08 22:16 ` Hugo Mills
2014-03-09 16:43 ` Hugo Mills
2014-03-10 22:28 ` Hugo Mills
2014-03-14 2:19 ` Marc MERLIN
2014-03-14 13:36 ` Wang Shilong [this message]
2014-03-14 14:36 ` [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: fsck: disable --init-extent-tree option when using snapshots Josef Bacik
2014-03-17 12:21 ` Shilong Wang
2014-03-14 1:48 ` 3.14.0-rc3: btrfs send/receive blocks btrfs IO on other devices (near deadlocks) Marc MERLIN
2014-03-14 4:54 ` Duncan
2014-03-14 14:42 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9BB6AEEF-1B52-449E-BB89-B3619EE968EB@gmail.com \
--to=wangshilong1991@gmail.com \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox