From: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Bug or feature? logical_to_ino skips inodes with offset mismatch
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 22:54:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9eb6d42e-a44b-c427-ed37-1eaa67944b3f@mendix.com> (raw)
I was playing around with logical_to_ino and also implemented calling
ino_lookup today to create a program that will print all data extents in
a block group, and their related inodes and at least one filename per inode.
https://github.com/knorrie/python-btrfs/commits/develop
See "examples: show filenames for data extents"
I ran into the following behaviour of logical_to_ino:
If the offset value in a backreference of an extent_item does not match
the offset value of the extent_data object in the fs tree,
logical_to_ino will skip the inode that uses data from the extent, and
not report it.
This leads to extents for which logical_to_ino does not give any result,
while there's actually a file using data from the extent.
Is this a bug or a feature?
How to test (only relevant output lines pasted):
1. copy a file into place:
-# cp /boot/vmlinuz-4.9.0-1-amd64 /mnt/i320/fstree/
-# examples/show_block_group_contents.py 289406976 /mnt/i320/fstree/
extent vaddr 336048128 length 4186112 refs 1 gen 57 flags DATA
inline extent data backref root 5 objectid 266 offset 0 count 1
-# examples/show_block_group_data_extent_filenames.py 289406976
/mnt/i320/fstree/
extent vaddr 336048128 length 4186112 refs 1 gen 57 flags DATA
root 5 inode 266 offset 0 path 'vmlinuz-4.9.0-1-amd64'
-# btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve 336048128 .
./vmlinuz-4.9.0-1-amd64
2. Now, overwrite the beginning of the file, so we have a new extent for
that data, and so that the old big extent holds 16kiB of
'wasted/unreachable' data at the beginning.
-# dd if=/dev/urandom bs=16k conv=notrunc of=vmlinuz-4.9.0-1-amd64 count=1
Result:
-# examples/show_block_group_contents.py 289406976 /mnt/i320/fstree/
extent vaddr 336048128 length 4186112 refs 1 gen 57 flags DATA
inline extent data backref root 5 objectid 266 offset 0 count 1
extent vaddr 341217280 length 16384 refs 1 gen 60 flags DATA
inline extent data backref root 5 objectid 266 offset 0 count 1
Notice that the backrefs both list offset 0, since there's only one per
referenced inode and it doesn't get updated when the're a change in
which parts of the extent are actually still used by the inode.
3. logical_to_ino does not list the inode any more as user of this
extent now:
-# examples/show_block_group_data_extent_filenames.py 289406976
/mnt/i320/fstree/
extent vaddr 336048128 length 4186112 refs 1 gen 57 flags DATA
extent vaddr 341217280 length 16384 refs 1 gen 60 flags DATA
root 5 inode 266 offset 0 path 'vmlinuz-4.9.0-1-amd64'
-# btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve 336048128 .
<no output>
-# btrfs-debug-tree -t 5 /dev/i320/fstree
item 6 key (266 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15765 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 341217280 nr 16384
extent data offset 0 nr 16384 ram 16384
extent compression(none)
item 7 key (266 EXTENT_DATA 16384) itemoff 15712 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 336048128 nr 4186112
extent data offset 16384 nr 4169728 ram 4186112
extent compression(none)
--
Hans van Kranenburg
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-05 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-05 21:54 Hans van Kranenburg [this message]
2017-02-05 22:45 ` Bug or feature? logical_to_ino skips inodes with offset mismatch Hans van Kranenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9eb6d42e-a44b-c427-ed37-1eaa67944b3f@mendix.com \
--to=hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox