From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chester Subject: Re: btrfs, broken design? Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:46:44 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1295558324-sup-1046@think> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To: linux-btrfs Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: Btrfs has its own wiki page at https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org which you may find more helpful than what is on wikipedia. 2011/1/20 Beno=EEt Thi=E9bault : > Thanks for your answer > > Le 20 janv. 2011 =E0 22:20, Chris Mason a =E9crit : > >> There was a bug fixed as part of that discussion, and I think I also >> better described the way the tree balancing works to Edward. > > Maybe the wikipedia article should be modified then, because it is no= t very reinsuring :-) > >> A final release? =A0We'll keep improving things for a long time. =A0= The >> biggest missing feature today is btrfsck, which I'm working on full = time >> right now. >> >> -chris > > Still on the wikipedia page, it's written "Btrfs 1.0 (with finalized = on-disk format) was originally slated for a late 2008 release,[5] but a= stable release has not been made as of January 2011.", which is also v= ery confusing. > > According to you, is the version of btrfs in 2.6.37 ready for product= ion? I mean, are there still chances that I may loose all my data if I = use btrfs? > > Last question, do you know when the RAID-5 like capabilities will be = available? > > Sorry to ask so many questions, I fully understand you and your team = are working very hard on the project, but I was very confused by the Wi= kipedia article. > > Kind regards, > > Ben-- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs= " in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html