From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@mikefedyk.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Subject: Default to read-only on snapshot creation and have a flag if snapshot should be writable (was: [PATCH 0/5] btrfs: Readonly snapshots)
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:02:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikbmUQA7JtkjV4177jmj9WDVe1V3NvbX3ts6TNd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> (Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> for changes in async snapshots)
>
> This patchset adds readonly-snapshots support. You can create a
> readonly snapshot, and you can also set a snapshot readonly/writable
> on the fly.
>
> A few readonly checks are added in setattr, permission, remove_xattr
> and set_xattr callbacks, as well as in some ioctls.
>
Great work!
I have a suggestion on defaults when snapshots are created. I think
they should default to being read-only and if they are meant to be
read-write a flag can be set at creation time (and changable at a
later time as well of course).
This way user/admin preconceptions of a snapshot being read-only can
be enforced by default, and the exception when you want a read-write
snapshot can be available with a switch at the cli level (and probably
a flag at the ioctl level).
It gives one more natural distinction between a snapshot and a
subvolume at the user conceptual level.
What do you think?
next reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-29 20:02 Mike Fedyk [this message]
2010-11-29 20:41 ` Default to read-only on snapshot creation and have a flag if snapshot should be writable (was: [PATCH 0/5] btrfs: Readonly snapshots) David Arendt
2010-11-29 21:08 ` Mike Fedyk
2010-11-29 21:31 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2010-11-29 21:43 ` Mike Fedyk
2010-11-29 21:48 ` Andrey Kuzmin
2010-11-30 0:33 ` C Anthony Risinger
2010-11-30 2:17 ` Li Zefan
2010-11-30 12:44 ` Andrey Kuzmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikbmUQA7JtkjV4177jmj9WDVe1V3NvbX3ts6TNd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@mikefedyk.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).