From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anish Tondwalkar <2012atondwal@tjhsst.edu> Subject: Re: Current state of hot data relocation functionality Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:36:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Bostjan Skufca Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: You can patch btrfs for experimental hot relocation. Ben Chociej posted this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/10= 22603 -- Anish Tondwalkar On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Bostjan Skufca wrote: > Anyone? > > On 18 September 2010 01:33, Bostjan Skufca wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> I was looking into some custom fileserver options and noticed two >> facts about ZFS - support for L2ARC (albeit not persistant across >> reboots, which is a downer) and OpenSolaris being a dead meat. Then = I >> found out that some patches were already floating around linux >> mailinglists, patches about hot data relocation, but unfortunately >> nothing definitive. So I would like to ask here: what is the status = of >> hot data relocation functionality? >> >> I haven't had a chance to try out btrfs myself, but from what I see = it >> sure looks promising and seems like an option worth waiting on (I me= an >> this from fileserver with SSD cache point of view). So keep up the >> good work, and thanks for an answer, if there will be one :) >> >> Take care, >> b. >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs= " in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at =A0http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html