From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rodrigo_E=2E_De_Le=C3=B3n_Plicet?= Subject: Re: 2.6.36-rc1 btrfs still unstable Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:25:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1281948382.1888.7.camel@chotu> <20100816121658.GT3315@think> <7222A6B8ACA37D4AA1AC37810C43E8A80F5FC5BC@mail.corp.imt-systems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "Morten P.D. Stevens" , Chris Mason , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" To: Chris Ball Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > Note that Btrfs does not yet have a fsck tool that can fix errors. > =C2=A0 While Btrfs is stable on a stable machine, it is currently pos= sible > =C2=A0 to corrupt a filesystem irrecoverably if your machine crashes = or > =C2=A0 loses power. =C2=A0This will be fixed when the fsck tool is re= ady. Um, is this related to disks lying about actually writing to spinning rust, or can this happen on disks that do so properly? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html