From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mitch Harder Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:56:37 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1295298216-sup-6206@think> <20110118101436.GA2652@scooter> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Felix Blanke , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: C Anthony Risinger Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:22 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Felix Blanke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just slap me if the question is stupid, but when will all those new features be added >> to the btrfs-progs? >> >> The last commit is at >> "git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git" >> is from oct. 2010?!? > > i don't know about the readonly snapshots, but the LZO stuff is a > mount option; should be in the pull. > > and for the record, i'm totally stoked to run LZO on all my btrfs > machines (esp. the netbooks/SSDs :-) > > C Anthony There was also a patch submitted by Li Zefan for LZO support in btrfs-progs: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg06931.html If I recall correctly, btrfs-progs will throw out an error once you use LZO compression since btrfs-progs needs to be made aware of the INCOMPAT flag in the patch submitted above. My local btrfs-progs git repository also incorporates patches to support mixed data+metadata (which also uses an INCOMPAT flag aleady in the kernel code) and for the filesystem diskinfo command. A quick search for "btrfs-progs" in my Mailing List archive turns up a number of other btrfs-progs patch proposals since October.