From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel J Blueman Subject: Re: [PATCH] mark internal functions static Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:30:42 +0800 Message-ID: References: <4DA32231.5000806@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Chris Mason , Linux BTRFS To: Josef Bacik Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4DA32231.5000806@redhat.com> List-ID: On 11 April 2011 23:45, Josef Bacik wrote: > On 04/11/2011 11:40 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> This didn't make it in before, so updating to 2.6.39-rc2 and resendi= ng: >> >> Prevent needless exporting of internal functions from compilation >> units by marking them static. >> > > Looks like you have line wrapping on or something, the page looks man= gled. > =A0Thanks, The only way I can solve this in gmail webmail is by attaching the patc= h. Is this acceptable? I guess if the mailing list strips patches, I guess using both may be a get-out-of-jail... Daniel --=20 Daniel J Blueman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html