* looking for non existent devices
@ 2012-03-17 9:32 Helmut Hullen
2012-03-21 18:12 ` Ilya Dryomov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Helmut Hullen @ 2012-03-17 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
some commands still look for non existent devices.
I don't use "udev".
When I run
btrfs filesystem show
only the existent devices are shown - fine.
When I run
btrfs filesystem label
or
btrfs scrub status /dev/sdxn
then I get a lot of error messages with (p.e.)
failed to read /dev/hda6: No such device or address
failed to read /dev/sdm7: No such device or address
failed to read /dev/sr3: No such device or address
Kernel 3.2.9
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for non existent devices
2012-03-17 9:32 looking for non existent devices Helmut Hullen
@ 2012-03-21 18:12 ` Ilya Dryomov
2012-03-21 18:24 ` Helmut Hullen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2012-03-21 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: helmut; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 10:32:00AM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, linux-btrfs,
>
> some commands still look for non existent devices.
>
> I don't use "udev".
> When I run
>
> btrfs filesystem show
>
> only the existent devices are shown - fine.
>
> When I run
>
> btrfs filesystem label
>
> or
>
> btrfs scrub status /dev/sdxn
>
> then I get a lot of error messages with (p.e.)
>
> failed to read /dev/hda6: No such device or address
> failed to read /dev/sdm7: No such device or address
> failed to read /dev/sr3: No such device or address
Hi Helmut,
I think this has been fixed in recent btrfs-progs, commit 32eff711.
Could test with that commit present please ? (You can get it from
dangerdonteveruse branch of Chris' btrfs-progs repo [1], the 'danger'
tag is irrelevant as long as you don't try to run fsck from that branch)
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs.git
Thanks,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for non existent devices
2012-03-21 18:12 ` Ilya Dryomov
@ 2012-03-21 18:24 ` Helmut Hullen
2012-03-21 18:52 ` Ilya Dryomov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Helmut Hullen @ 2012-03-21 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Hallo, Ilya,
Du meintest am 21.03.12:
>> When I run
>>
>> btrfs filesystem label
>>
>> or
>>
>> btrfs scrub status /dev/sdxn
>>
>> then I get a lot of error messages with (p.e.)
>>
>> failed to read /dev/hda6: No such device or address
>> failed to read /dev/sdm7: No such device or address
>> failed to read /dev/sr3: No such device or address
> I think this has been fixed in recent btrfs-progs, commit 32eff711.
It is fixed in some (or many) places, it is not fixed everywhere. I had
used kernel 3.2.9
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for non existent devices
2012-03-21 18:24 ` Helmut Hullen
@ 2012-03-21 18:52 ` Ilya Dryomov
2012-03-21 19:26 ` Helmut Hullen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ilya Dryomov @ 2012-03-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: helmut; +Cc: linux-btrfs
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:24:00PM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Ilya,
>
> Du meintest am 21.03.12:
>
> >> When I run
> >>
> >> btrfs filesystem label
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> btrfs scrub status /dev/sdxn
> >>
> >> then I get a lot of error messages with (p.e.)
> >>
> >> failed to read /dev/hda6: No such device or address
> >> failed to read /dev/sdm7: No such device or address
> >> failed to read /dev/sr3: No such device or address
>
> > I think this has been fixed in recent btrfs-progs, commit 32eff711.
>
> It is fixed in some (or many) places, it is not fixed everywhere. I had
> used kernel 3.2.9
32eff711 is supposed to fix it in more places, filesystem label and
scrub status included. This is purely a userspace issue, commit and
repo I pointed you to are for btrfs-progs, not the kernel. You are
probably on branch master, it doesn't have that commit yet, only
dangerdonteveruse branch does.
Thanks,
Ilya
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: looking for non existent devices
2012-03-21 18:52 ` Ilya Dryomov
@ 2012-03-21 19:26 ` Helmut Hullen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Helmut Hullen @ 2012-03-21 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-btrfs
Hallo, Ilya,
Du meintest am 21.03.12:
>>> I think this has been fixed in recent btrfs-progs, commit 32eff711.
>> It is fixed in some (or many) places, it is not fixed everywhere. I
>> had used kernel 3.2.9
> 32eff711 is supposed to fix it in more places, filesystem label and
> scrub status included. This is purely a userspace issue, commit and
> repo I pointed you to are for btrfs-progs, not the kernel. You are
> probably on branch master, it doesn't have that commit yet, only
> dangerdonteveruse branch does.
Ok - I'll take a try. But it's not urgent ...
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-21 19:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-17 9:32 looking for non existent devices Helmut Hullen
2012-03-21 18:12 ` Ilya Dryomov
2012-03-21 18:24 ` Helmut Hullen
2012-03-21 18:52 ` Ilya Dryomov
2012-03-21 19:26 ` Helmut Hullen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).