From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hullen@t-online.de (Helmut Hullen)
Subject: Re: kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?)
Date: 08 May 2012 15:13:00 +0200
Message-ID: <C8TFFEueCXB@helmut.hullen.de>
References: <CAFvQSYTK1HAS+gK=SqvXngrESkG5J2nJh5r9FraVGfL7XzmoEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: helmut@hullen.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFvQSYTK1HAS+gK=SqvXngrESkG5J2nJh5r9FraVGfL7XzmoEQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Hallo, Clemens,

Du meintest am 08.05.12:

>>> But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for
>>> repairing an ext2/3/4 system.

> Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as
> doomed.

Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the  
directory tree does the job.

Viele Gruesse!
Helmut