From: "cheater00 ." <cheater00@gmail.com>
To: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bad fs performance, IO freezes
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:43:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+9GZUipGeuNuVP2=g2+gbWpJWxbeHVQEcQ5QYfOCWjkv5JDcQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9GZUi9jiJ9RBezrh7Xi4_1eBpyeNBdrs+hYxsECaa_a9_csA@mail.gmail.com>
So far I cannot reproduce. If I don't post again this means the issue
has been fixed by updating the kernel.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:40 PM, cheater00 . <cheater00@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have located 4.3.0-rc7 binaries which I will now try.
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:38 PM, cheater00 . <cheater00@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply. What version did this go into? I'll try getting
>> a prebuilt backport of the kernel, building source could slow things
>> down considerably, but debs will not be available for the latest few
>> minor versions I guess. So if you can tell me a min version, I'll try
>> to find the latest deb newer than that, or I'll build if that's not
>> available.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/26/2015 08:16 PM, cheater00 . wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> I am running into really bad performance. Here's my setup:
>>>>
>>>> WD Red 6 TB connected over USB2 to my core i7 laptop, running Ubuntu
>>>> 32-bit with kernel 4.0.4-040004-generic #201505171336.
>>>>
>>>> Single btrfs partition covering whole disk.
>>>>
>>>> Autodefrag is on.
>>>>
>>>> fstab line:
>>>> UUID=... /media/X btrfs rw,nosuid,nodev,autodefrag 0 0
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes when files are being modified or removed, I see
>>>> btrfs-transacti eat 100% cpu; during this time no io operations
>>>> succeed, that is, they're all stalled. You can't even ls on that fs.
>>>> This happens for several minutes then normal operation resumes. There
>>>> doesn't seem to be a rule to what will trigger this, other than
>>>> opening a single file and reading usually works quite well. (say,
>>>> watching a movie while all other programs are closed). But even moving
>>>> files off the disks triggers some sort of bug. Just now I am moving a
>>>> few files (just 30gb worth) onto another disk, and the bug triggers.
>>>> So btrfs-transacti was eating my cpu for over 5 minutes and according
>>>> to mv's output after this was done and cpu usage went back to normal
>>>> what I was waiting for was for a tiny png file to be removed. This is
>>>> pretty bad.
>>>>
>>>> I have tried defragmenting directories where files are being accessed
>>>> and moved. This hasn't helped.
>>>>
>>>> This happens whether the FS is near full or not. It currently is near
>>>> full but it wasn't before and it still did that. It still has about ~
>>>> 100GB free space now.
>>>>
>>>> The more things are happening the more often this bug gets triggered.
>>>> So if I have utorrent running and its temporary downloads directory is
>>>> there, its download speed graph will be a few spikes of running at
>>>> several MB/sec separated by durations of 0 download speed.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing seems to show up in dmesg or syslog.
>>>>
>>>> I have asked in #btrfs but the suggestions ended up not fixing the
>>>> issue (autodefrag, defrag dirs).
>>>>
>>>> Please advise what I should do with this issue.
>>>
>>>
>>> It might be related to delayed ref rework, the last time I saw this kind of
>>> hanging problem about btrfs-transaction eating cpu is that because btrfs
>>> doesn't merge delayed refs, it'd be best to try the lastest kernel and if
>>> the issue is not resolved, then we can work out a reproducer and provide
>>> debugging.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Liubo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-26 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-26 12:16 Bad fs performance, IO freezes cheater00 .
2015-10-26 13:32 ` Donald Pearson
2015-10-26 13:36 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-26 13:45 ` Donald Pearson
2015-10-26 13:46 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-26 13:56 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-26 14:00 ` Donald Pearson
2015-10-26 14:25 ` Liu Bo
2015-10-26 14:38 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-26 15:40 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-26 17:43 ` cheater00 . [this message]
2015-10-26 18:31 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 2:00 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 6:39 ` Duncan
2015-10-27 8:55 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 11:44 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-27 13:00 ` Henk Slager
2015-10-27 13:30 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-27 14:22 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 14:26 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 14:30 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 14:43 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 15:01 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-10-27 15:05 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 15:07 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-27 15:22 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-10-27 15:26 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-29 13:03 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-29 14:00 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-10-29 15:49 ` cheater00 .
2015-10-29 18:49 ` Henk Slager
2015-10-29 20:01 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-11-06 13:37 ` cheater00 .
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+9GZUipGeuNuVP2=g2+gbWpJWxbeHVQEcQ5QYfOCWjkv5JDcQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=cheater00@gmail.com \
--cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).