linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jayashree Mohan <jayashree2912@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vijaychidambaram Velayudhan Pillai <vijay@cs.utexas.edu>
Subject: btrfs crash consistency bug : Blocks allocated beyond eof are lost
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:23:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EzBbCronNb25yxmn8zsSUwQqJC26fWJ+XmFo-jdBHSd9s3uA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

On btrfs (as of kernel 4.15), say we fallocate a file with keep_size
option, followed by fdatasync() or fsync(). If we now crash, on
recovery we see a wrong block count and all the blocks allocated
beyond the eof are lost. This bug was reported(xfstest generic/468)
and patched on ext4[1], and a variant of this, that did not recover
the correct file size was patched in f2fs[2]. I am wondering why this
is still not fixed in btrfs. You can reproduce this bug on btrfs using
a tool called CrashMonkey that we are building at UT Austin, which is
a test harness for filesystem crash consistency checks[3]

To reproduce the bug, simply run :
 ./c_harness -f /dev/sda -d /dev/cow_ram0 -t btrfs -e 102400  -v
tests/generic_468.so

Is there a reason why this is not yet patched in btrfs? I don't see
why even after a fsync(), losing the blocks allocated beyond the eof
are acceptable.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10120293/
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-f2fs/mailman/message/36104201/
[3] https://github.com/utsaslab/crashmonkey

Thanks,

Jayashree Mohan
2nd Year PhD in Computer Science
University of Texas at Austin.

             reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22  2:23 Jayashree Mohan [this message]
2018-02-23 16:35 ` btrfs crash consistency bug : Blocks allocated beyond eof are lost Jayashree Mohan
2018-02-23 16:40   ` Filipe Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+EzBbCronNb25yxmn8zsSUwQqJC26fWJ+XmFo-jdBHSd9s3uA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jayashree2912@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vijay@cs.utexas.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).