From: Tim Cuthbertson <ratcheer@gmail.com>
To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Fwd: Confusion about snapshots containers
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:20:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAKzf7n=e9Onnc5D-U_zBtXXpFk11QiN7RhisqAB5Ej0DQOcfA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329215554.GT11714@carfax.org.uk>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Date: Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: Confusion about snapshots containers
To: Tim Cuthbertson <ratcheer@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:27:30PM -0500, Tim Cuthbertson wrote:
> I have recently switched from multiple partitions with multiple
> btrfs's to a flat layout. I will try to keep my question concise.
>
> I am confused as to whether a snapshots container should be a normal
> directory or a mountable subvolume. I do not understand how it can be
> a normal directory while being at the same level as, for example, a
> rootfs subvolume. This is with the understanding that the rootfs is
> NOT at the btrfs top level.
>
> Which should it be, a normal directory or a mountable subvolume
> directly under btrfs top level? If either way can work, what are the
> pros and cons of each?
The current best practice recommendation is that it should be a
normal directory, not contained within any of the subvolumes that are
being snapshotted. So (using the @-prefix convention to indicate a
subvol), you'd have something like this:
<top-level>
@root
@home
snapshots
root
@2017-03-28
@2017-03-29
home
@2017-03-28
@2017-03-29
To use this, mount the top level of the FS (-o subvolid=0) on a
known path, such as /media/btrfs/<fslabel>/, and do the subvol
management, and nothing else, under that mount.
(Optionally, you can flatten the dir hierarchy to
/snapshots/@root-2017-03-28, but I prefer the slightly deeper version
above).
The snapshots container can be either a dir or a subvol, but you
gain almost nothing from it being a subvol, and you lose the ability
to move subvols/snapshots in and out of it cheaply with mv. Hence the
recommendation to use a directory.
Hugo.
--
Hugo Mills | O tempura! O moresushi!
hugo@... carfax.org.uk |
http://carfax.org.uk/ |
PGP: E2AB1DE4 |
Thank you Hugo. That seems to work.
So, another question...
Do I then leave the top level mounted all the time for snapshots, or
should I create them, send them to external storage, and umount until
next time?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 23:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-29 21:27 Confusion about snapshots containers Tim Cuthbertson
2017-03-29 21:55 ` Hugo Mills
2017-03-29 23:20 ` Tim Cuthbertson [this message]
2017-03-30 3:46 ` Fwd: " Duncan
2017-03-30 13:07 ` Tim Cuthbertson
2017-03-31 11:34 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-03-31 17:40 ` Kai Krakow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAKzf7n=e9Onnc5D-U_zBtXXpFk11QiN7RhisqAB5Ej0DQOcfA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ratcheer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).