linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "^m'e" <marcoep@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: btrfs check: backref lost, mismatch with its hash -- can't repair
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:49:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAxOLF9NTd4TcDc1FW23CE=5nR-Kp62=OJz31XmG_LqZBZJmsg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0a66bee-f648-9f00-b56b-b59646c06779@gmx.com>

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年01月29日 21:58, ^m'e wrote:
>> Thanks for the advice, Qu!
>>
>> I used the system for a while, did some package upgrades -- writing in
>> the suspect corrupted area. Then tried a btrfs-send to my backup vol,
>> and it failed miserably with a nice kernel oops.
>>
>> So I went for a lowmem repair:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> # ./btrfsck.static check --repair --mode=lowmem /dev/sdb3 2>&1 | tee
>> /mnt/custom/rescue/btrfs-recovery/btrfs-repair.BTR-POOL.1.log
>> WARNING: low-memory mode repair support is only partial
>> Fixed 0 roots.
>> checking extents
>> checking free space cache
>> checking fs roots
>> ERROR: failed to add inode 28891726 as orphan item root 257
>> ERROR: root 257 INODE[28891726] is orphan item
>
> At least I need dig the kernel code further to determine if the orphan
> inode handling in btrfs-progs is correct or not.
>
> So there won't be more dirty fix soon.
>
> Hopefully you could get some good backup and restore the system.
>
> At least the problem is limited to a very small range, and it's
> something we could handle easily.
>
> Thanks for all your report,
> Qu
>
>

Right.

Meanwhile, could you please suggest the best course of action? btrfs
rescue or restore?
I have snapshots of my two subvols (rootfs, home -- now fs-checking
them  just in case...)

Cheers,

  Marco

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-29 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-22 14:11 btrfs check: backref lost, mismatch with its hash -- can't repair ^m'e
2018-01-22 14:38 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-22 15:04   ` ^m'e
2018-01-24  8:49     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-24  9:18       ` Foo Bar
2018-01-24 10:14         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-24 11:57           ` ^m'e
2018-01-24 12:39             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-24 14:47               ` ^m'e
2018-01-24 19:00                 ` ^m'e
2018-01-24 20:41                   ` ^m'e
2018-01-25  0:59                     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-25 11:54                       ` ^m'e
2018-01-25 12:09                         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-25 12:29                           ` ^m'e
2018-01-25 12:37                             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-25 16:40                               ` ^m'e
2018-01-25 23:30                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-26 11:19                                   ` ^m'e
2018-01-26 12:16                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-26 15:15                                       ` ^m'e
2018-01-29  1:34                                         ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 13:58                                           ` ^m'e
2018-01-29 14:04                                             ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 14:49                                               ` ^m'e [this message]
2018-01-29 15:08                                                 ` ^m'e
2018-01-29 15:10                                                   ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 15:09                                                 ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-29 18:16                                                   ` ^m'e
2018-01-30  1:24                                                     ` Qu Wenruo
2018-01-30 20:14                                                       ` Foo Bar
2018-01-25  0:59                   ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAxOLF9NTd4TcDc1FW23CE=5nR-Kp62=OJz31XmG_LqZBZJmsg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=marcoep@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).