linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
To: wangyugui@e16-tech.com, dsterba@suse.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: utils: fix btrfs_wipe_existing_sb probe bug
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:19:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC2o3D+TkW7js=C+XYdnxs8wxruQ3kT3rutVBeuaozz2N9FDMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409123251.86BE.409509F4@e16-tech.com>

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:32 PM Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > btrfs_wipe_existing_sb() misses calling blkid_do_fullprobe() to do
> > the real probe. After calling blkid_new_probe() &
> > blkid_probe_set_device() to setup blkid_probe context, it directly
> > calls blkid_probe_lookup_value(). This results in
> > blkid_probe_lookup_value returning -1, because pr->values is empty.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  common/device-utils.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/device-utils.c b/common/device-utils.c
> > index c860b946..f8e2e776 100644
> > --- a/common/device-utils.c
> > +++ b/common/device-utils.c
> > @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int btrfs_wipe_existing_sb(int fd)
> >       if (!pr)
> >               return -1;
> >
> > -     if (blkid_probe_set_device(pr, fd, 0, 0)) {
> > +     if (blkid_probe_set_device(pr, fd, 0, 0) || blkid_do_fullprobe(pr)) {
> >               ret = -1;
> >               goto out;
> >       }
> > --
> > 2.31.0
>
>
> With this patch,  'mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/sdb' output some
> error when /dev/nvme0n1 have 2 partitions.
>         ERROR: cannot wipe superblocks on /dev/nvme0n1

I am not sure this error is caused by my improper fix, or bugs lie
somewhere else on mkfs.btrfs path.

But without this patch, I think, btrfs_wipe_existing_sb will not do
what is supposed to do -- wiping out existing superblocks.
Instead, it does nothing and always returns 1. Since it has no effect
and nobody complaints about it, that brings a question, do we really
need to call it in btrfs_prepare_device?

> # blkid
> /dev/nvme0n1: PTUUID="93a54ce8-04b2-470b-8c05-31bfcef02f28" PTTYPE="gpt"
> /dev/sda1: LABEL="OS_USB" UUID="2b7f4cb9-3dac-443f-8c96-a907b9276942" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="xfs" PARTUUID="ee58e9d3-01"
> /dev/nvme0n1p1: UUID="1d94dc2b-abd1-47df-bf39-ab31cf579d29" UUID_SUB="577542b7-91f5-48d4-a54c-98cbd4525c00" BLOCK_SIZE="4096" TYPE="btrfs" PARTLABEL="primary" PARTUUID="efed009f-8ae6-4567-9cd3-80a57cdcf225"
> /dev/nvme0n1p2: PARTLABEL="primary" PARTUUID="fcab66cd-daad-457f-a53c-110592d8941f"
> ...
>
>
> Without this patch,  'mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/nvme0n1 /dev/sdb' have some
> issue too when /dev/nvme0n1 and /dev/sdb  have some partitions.
>
> some blkid of partition is still left in the output of blkid.
> 'blockdev --rereadpt' will let them disappear.
>
> Best Regards
> Wang Yugui (wangyugui@e16-tech.com)
> 2021/04/09
>
>

thanks,
fox

      reply	other threads:[~2021-04-15  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-25 13:10 [PATCH] btrfs-progs: utils: fix btrfs_wipe_existing_sb probe bug Fox Chen
2021-04-09  4:32 ` Wang Yugui
2021-04-15  6:19   ` Fox Chen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAC2o3D+TkW7js=C+XYdnxs8wxruQ3kT3rutVBeuaozz2N9FDMA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=foxhlchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangyugui@e16-tech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).