linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sandra Schlichting <littlesandra88@gmail.com>
To: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@gmail.com>
Cc: Billy Crook <billycrook@gmail.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Encryption implementation like ZFS?
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 15:12:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAELiMBMc5ysTSqKSOgCeUq2imqPFmX=LoP3P8e0KEL07usNdQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111231095331.GA2829@scooter>

> The advantage of loopaes is that it is more secure then luks and way faster.
> The speed with encryption (loopaes) is about 90-95% the speed without encryption at
> my setup.

Sounds very interesting. Will try that.

I case of my PC I would actually prefer a weaker encryption, as I am
not protecting my data from NSA, but from a person with a non-crypto
background, but I don't suppose btrfs will have such option =)

In terms of parallelization, would there be benefits of having the
encryption done by btrfs?

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-31 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-30 18:32 Encryption implementation like ZFS? Sandra Schlichting
2011-12-30 19:27 ` Billy Crook
2011-12-30 20:12   ` Sandra Schlichting
2011-12-30 20:49     ` Billy Crook
2011-12-30 21:12       ` Sandra Schlichting
2011-12-31  9:53       ` Felix Blanke
2011-12-31 14:12         ` Sandra Schlichting [this message]
2011-12-31  9:53     ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-12-31 14:00       ` Sandra Schlichting
2011-12-31 17:12         ` Niels de Carpentier
2011-12-31 23:04           ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2012-01-01 15:22             ` Niels de Carpentier
2011-12-31 16:01     ` Edward Ned Harvey
2011-12-30 22:10   ` Tomasz Torcz
2011-12-31  3:36     ` Niels de Carpentier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAELiMBMc5ysTSqKSOgCeUq2imqPFmX=LoP3P8e0KEL07usNdQQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=littlesandra88@gmail.com \
    --cc=billycrook@gmail.com \
    --cc=felixblanke@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).