Re: [markfasheh/duperemove] Why blocksize is limit to 1MB?

[Peter Becker <floyd.net@gmail.com>]

Good hint, this would be an option and i will try this.

Regardless of this the curiosity has packed me and I will try to
figure out where the problem with the low transfer rate is.

2017-01-04 0:07 GMT+01:00 Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>:
> On 01/03/2017 08:24 PM, Peter Becker wrote:
>> All invocations are justified, but not relevant in (offline) backup
>> and archive scenarios.
>>
>> For example you have multiple version of append-only log-files or
>> append-only db-files (each more then 100GB in size), like this:
>>
>>> Snapshot_01_01_2017
>> -> file1.log .. 201 GB
>>
>>> Snapshot_02_01_2017
>> -> file1.log .. 205 GB
>>
>>> Snapshot_03_01_2017
>> -> file1.log .. 221 GB
>>
>> The first 201 GB would be every time the same.
>> Files a copied at night from windows, linux or bsd systems and
>> snapshoted after copy.
>
> XY problem?
>
> Why not use rsync --inplace in combination with btrfs snapshots? Even if
> the remote does not support rsync and you need to pull the full file
> first, you could again use rsync locally.
>
> --
> Hans van Kranenburg