From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:39670 "EHLO mail-qa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754039Ab2HNOV1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:21:27 -0400 Received: by qaas11 with SMTP id s11so1813277qaa.19 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:21:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5027DDFC.60504@pocock.com.au> <502A529B.8060201@pocock.com.au> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:21:26 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: raw partition or LV for btrfs? From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: cwillu Cc: Daniel Pocock , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:09 PM, cwillu wrote: >>> If I understand correctly, if I don't use LVM, then such move and resize >>> operations can't be done for an online filesystem and it has more risk. >> >> You can resize, add, and remove devices from btrfs online without the >> need for LVM. IIRC LVM has finer granularity though, you can do >> something like "move only the first 10GB now, I'll move the rest >> later". > > You can certainly resize the filesystem itself, but without lvm I > don't believe you can resize the underlying partition online. I'm pretty sure you can do that with parted. At least, when your version of parted is NOT 2.2. -- Fajar