From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:41675 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754225Ab2F2Km1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:42:27 -0400 Received: by dady13 with SMTP id y13so4206127dad.19 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:42:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:42:26 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kernel panic from "btrfs subvolume delete" From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Richard Cooper Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Richard Cooper wrote: > Hi All, > > I have two machines where I've been testing various btrfs based backup strategies. They are both Cent OS 6 with the standard kernel and btrfs-progs RPMs from the CentOS repos. > > - kernel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 > - btrfs-progs-0.19-12.el6.x86_64 In btrfs terms, 2.6.32 is ... stone age :P > What should I do now? Do I need to upgrade to a more recent btrfs? Yep > If so, how? https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/entry/oracle_unbreakable_enterprise_kernel_release http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml -- Fajar