linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juan Alberto Cirez <jacirez@rdcsafety.com>
To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Add device while rebalancing
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 05:44:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHaPQf39H-JRhQmCssmgJ98RCxL_36poE_kObAmgmH6nkn4xoA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571F4CD0.9050004@gmail.com>

Well,
RAID1 offers no parity, striping, or spanning of disk space across
multiple disks.

RAID10 configuration, on the other hand, requires a minimum of four
HDD, but it stripes data across mirrored pairs. As long as one disk in
each mirrored pair is functional, data can be retrieved.

With GlusterFS as a distributed volume, the files are already spread
among the servers causing file I/O to be spread fairly evenly among
them as well, thus probably providing the benefit one might expect
with stripe (RAID10).

The question I have now is: Should I use a RAID10 or RAID1 underneath
of a GlusterFS stripped (and possibly replicated) volume?

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
<ahferroin7@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2016-04-26 06:50, Juan Alberto Cirez wrote:
>>
>> Thank you guys so very kindly for all your help and taking the time to
>> answer my question. I have been reading the wiki and online use cases
>> and otherwise delving deeper into the btrfs architecture.
>>
>> I am managing a 520TB storage pool spread across 16 server pods and
>> have tried several methods of distributed storage. Last attempt was
>> using Zfs as a base for the physical bricks and GlusterFS as a glue to
>> string together the storage pool. I was not satisfied with the results
>> (mainly Zfs). Once I have run btrfs for a while on the test server
>> (32TB, 8x 4TB HDD RAID10) for a while I will try btrfs/ceph
>
> For what it's worth, GlusterFS works great on top of BTRFS.  I don't have
> any claims to usage in production, but I've done _a lot_ of testing with it
> because we're replacing one of our critical file servers at work with a
> couple of systems set up with Gluster on top of BTRFS, and I've been looking
> at setting up a small storage cluster at home using it on a couple of
> laptops I have which have non-functional displays.  Based on what I've seen,
> it appears to be rock solid with respect to the common failure modes,
> provided you use something like raid1 mode on the BTRFS side of things.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-26 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22 20:36 Add device while rebalancing Juan Alberto Cirez
2016-04-23  5:38 ` Duncan
2016-04-25 11:18   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-25 12:43     ` Duncan
2016-04-25 13:02       ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-26 10:50         ` Juan Alberto Cirez
2016-04-26 11:11           ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-26 11:44             ` Juan Alberto Cirez [this message]
2016-04-26 12:04               ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-26 12:14                 ` Juan Alberto Cirez
2016-04-26 12:44                   ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-27  0:58               ` Chris Murphy
2016-04-27 10:37                 ` Duncan
2016-04-27 11:22                 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-27 15:58                   ` Juan Alberto Cirez
2016-04-27 16:29                     ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-04-27 16:38                       ` Juan Alberto Cirez
2016-04-27 16:40                         ` Juan Alberto Cirez
2016-04-27 17:23                           ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-04-27 23:19                   ` Chris Murphy
2016-04-28 11:21                     ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHaPQf39H-JRhQmCssmgJ98RCxL_36poE_kObAmgmH6nkn4xoA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jacirez@rdcsafety.com \
    --cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).