linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
To: siranee.ja@tpc.co.th
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
	Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	voravat@tpcorp.co.th
Subject: Re: btrfs issue with mariadb incremental backup
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:34:01 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJCQCtRqkigHcGLorR3EN5TbGSRCJG3YkdGE_BG80SBXFes7vA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420.49.228.123.163.1502514511.squirrel@mail>

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:08 PM,  <siranee.ja@tpc.co.th> wrote:


> The backup script has the btrfs sync command since Aug 3


>From your script:
> system btrfs sub snap -r $basepath $snappath
> system btrfs sub sync $basepath

>From the man page: sync <path> [subvolid...]
           Wait until given subvolume(s) are completely removed from the
           filesystem after deletion.


This 'subvolume sync' command, per the man page, is only about
subvolume deletion. I suggest replacing it with a regular sync
command.

I think the problem is that the script does things so fast that the
snapshot is not always consistent on disk before btrfs send starts.
It's just a guess though. If I'm right, this means the rsync mismaches
mean the destination snapshots are bad. Here's what I would do:


- delete all the bad/mismatching snapshots only on the destination computer.

- he most recent good snapshot pair, which rsync shows origin and
destination match, is mysql_201708080830 so you can keep that one on
both sides.

- manually do incremental send/receive, starting with
mysql_201708090830/, to make the destination current again with the
origin.

- confirm with rsync that the snapshot pairs on origin and destination
are the same

- now resume using the modified script, which will do snapshot -> sync -> send.

OPTIONAL, you could add to your script an rsync -avnc to double check
that the incremental send receive is working. This is admittedly
inefficient because it checks the *entire* contents of the snapshots
on both sides, it's not just checking the incremental data. But if it
doesn't take too long, it will help restore trust in send/receive, and
confirm that a regular sync is needed in between snapshot and send.




-- 
Chris Murphy

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-12 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-09  4:32 btrfs issue with mariadb incremental backup siranee.ja
2017-08-09  5:46 ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-09  6:36   ` siranee.ja
2017-08-09 17:59     ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-10  2:03       ` siranee.ja
2017-08-11  4:40       ` siranee.ja
2017-08-11  6:00         ` siranee.ja
2017-08-11 15:35           ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-12  2:38             ` siranee.ja
2017-08-12  4:31               ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-12  5:08                 ` siranee.ja
2017-08-12 21:34                   ` Chris Murphy [this message]
2017-08-12 22:41                     ` Janos Toth F.
2017-08-12 23:07                       ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-12 22:49                     ` Hugo Mills
2017-08-12 23:14                       ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-13  2:20                     ` siranee.ja
2017-08-13  2:59                       ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-13  3:40                         ` siranee.ja
2017-08-13  4:34                           ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-13 10:49                             ` siranee.ja
2017-08-13 19:31                               ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-13  6:20                           ` A L
2017-08-13 10:52                             ` siranee.ja
2017-08-13 12:51                               ` A L
2017-08-13 14:00                                 ` siranee.ja
2017-08-13 21:31                                   ` A L
2017-08-14  1:57                                     ` siranee.ja
2017-08-13 19:50                               ` Chris Murphy
2017-08-14  2:04                                 ` siranee.ja
2017-08-11 15:06         ` Chris Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJCQCtRqkigHcGLorR3EN5TbGSRCJG3YkdGE_BG80SBXFes7vA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lists@colorremedies.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=siranee.ja@tpc.co.th \
    --cc=voravat@tpcorp.co.th \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).