* 5.12-rc6 splat, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low, Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_work_helper
@ 2021-04-09 21:22 Chris Murphy
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Chris Murphy @ 2021-04-09 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Btrfs BTRFS
Got this while building bolt in a podman container. I've got reproduce
steps and test files here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948054
[ 3229.119497] overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling
back to index=off and metacopy=off.
[ 3229.155339] overlayfs: upper fs does not support xattr, falling
back to index=off and metacopy=off.
[ 3238.380647] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!
[ 3238.380654] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[ 3238.380656] Please attach the output of /proc/lock_stat to the bug report
[ 3238.380657] CPU: 4 PID: 9115 Comm: kworker/u16:20 Not tainted
5.12.0-0.rc6.184.fc35.x86_64+debug #1
[ 3238.380660] Hardware name: Apple Inc.
MacBookPro8,2/Mac-94245A3940C91C80, BIOS
MBP81.88Z.0050.B00.1804101331 04/10/18
[ 3238.380663] Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_work_helper
[ 3238.380670] Call Trace:
[ 3238.380674] dump_stack+0x7f/0xa1
[ 3238.380680] __lock_acquire.cold+0x1a9/0x2bf
[ 3238.380686] ? __lock_acquire+0x3ac/0x1e10
[ 3238.380691] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x3a0
[ 3238.380695] ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x45/0x60
[ 3238.380699] ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x3a0
[ 3238.380702] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa7/0x120
[ 3238.380706] ? __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x6b/0x1e0
[ 3238.380711] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4d/0x90
[ 3238.380715] ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x45/0x60
[ 3238.380718] percpu_counter_add_batch+0x45/0x60
[ 3238.380721] account_page_dirtied+0x102/0x320
[ 3238.380724] __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0xa2/0x1e0
[ 3238.380727] set_extent_buffer_dirty+0x63/0x80
[ 3238.380732] btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty+0x60/0x80
[ 3238.380737] copy_for_split+0x29e/0x360
[ 3238.380741] split_leaf+0x1c2/0x5e0
[ 3238.380746] btrfs_search_slot+0x99a/0x9f0
[ 3238.380751] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x58/0xa0
[ 3238.380754] cow_file_range_inline.constprop.0+0x1cf/0x760
[ 3238.380758] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x82/0xd0
[ 3238.380762] ? zstd_put_workspace+0x82/0x160
[ 3238.380765] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x82/0xd0
[ 3238.380769] compress_file_range+0x471/0x830
[ 3238.380774] async_cow_start+0x12/0x30
[ 3238.380777] ? submit_compressed_extents+0x410/0x410
[ 3238.380779] btrfs_work_helper+0x105/0x400
[ 3238.380782] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa7/0x120
[ 3238.380786] process_one_work+0x2b0/0x5e0
[ 3238.380791] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
[ 3238.380793] ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0
[ 3238.380796] kthread+0x13a/0x150
[ 3238.380799] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
[ 3238.380801] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
The /proc/lock_stat is in the downstream bug as an attachment. There's
possibly three things going on here, the bogus overlayfs warning, the
lockdep bug, and the call trace with btrfs bits in it. No idea if they
are related.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-04-09 21:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-09 21:22 5.12-rc6 splat, MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low, Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_work_helper Chris Murphy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).