From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:35799 "EHLO
        mail-lf0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751080AbcJJACE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 9 Oct 2016 20:02:04 -0400
Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l131so96351484lfl.2
        for <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 17:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAB9fVVH6S-Y0Li=6xyw2P23CEPwVRA6hRbjJNi+_3etHnqMh1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB9fVVH6S-Y0Li=6xyw2P23CEPwVRA6hRbjJNi+_3etHnqMh1w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tomasz Kusmierz <tom.kusmierz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 01:01:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKinxcWNP_tf77RkVAjE8C2Nd6LYDsAT2VJNM_m6QYmO7nVE9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: raid levels and NAS drives
To: Charles Zeitler <cfzeitler@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

And what exactly are NAS drives ?

Are you talking marketing by any chance ? Please, tell me you got the pun.

On 10 October 2016 at 00:12, Charles Zeitler <cfzeitler@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any advantage to using NAS drives
> under RAID levels,  as oppposed to regular
> 'desktop' drives for BTRFS?
>
> Charles Zeitler
>
> --
>  The Perfect Is The Enemy Of
>  The Good Enough
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html