linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 2/2] fstests: btrfs/089: Test for incorrect exclusive refernce number after file clone.
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:52:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL3q7H5JF9hRFBasU1DyW0uoW3MQ0tbByjEMru-KmbKp7Was4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428397482-13658-2-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> [Problem]
> Since commit fcebe4562dec83b3f8d308 ("Btrfs: rework qgroup accounting"),
> quota data update is delayed after delayed_ref calculation, and lacks
> correct protection to detect root reference which shouldn't be counted
> in current sequence number but already written into extent backref.
>
> This makes exclusive reference not decreased correctly and give incorrect
> result.
>
> [Test procedure]
> 1. Create a btrfs with 3 subvolumes, quota enabled and rescanned.
> 2. Create a file in 1st subvolume
> 3. Clone the file to 2nd and 3rd subvolume
> 4. Sync the fs to reflect the changes in qgroup.
> 5. Check the qgroup data
>
> [Expected result]
> None of the subvolume has exclusive reference to the file.
>
> [Actual result]
> The first subvolume still have exclusive reference to the file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Thanks Qu, only a couple minor nitpicks below.

> ---
> changelog:
> v2:
>    Redirect error output of dd to seqres.full for debug in case dd
>    failed.
> v3:
>    Add support and check for old kernel which doesn't support
>    noinode_cache mount option.
>    Change nodesize to 64K to support arch whose page size can be larger
>    than 4K.
> RESEND:
>    Rebase to latest xfstests.
> ---
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/089     | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/089.out |   5 +++
>  tests/btrfs/group   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/089
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/089.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/089 b/tests/btrfs/089
> new file mode 100755
> index 0000000..2f1adac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/089
> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# FS QA Test No. 089
> +#
> +# Test for incorrect exclusive reference count after cloning file
> +# between subvolumes.
> +#
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +# Copyright (c) 2015 Fujitsu. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +# published by the Free Software Foundation.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation,
> +# Inc.,  51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
> +#-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> +#
> +
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1       # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +    rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +_need_to_be_root
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_cp_reflink
> +
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# use largest node/leaf size (64K) to allow the test to be run on arch with
> +# page size > 4k.
> +NODESIZE=65536
> +SUPPORT_NOINODE_CACHE="yes"
> +
> +run_check _scratch_mkfs "--nodesize $NODESIZE"
> +
> +# inode cache will also take space in fs tree, disable them to get consistent
> +# result.
> +# discard error output since we will check return value manually.
> +_scratch_mount "-o noinode_cache" 2> /dev/null
> +
> +# Check for old kernel which doesn't support 'noinode_cache' mount option
> +if [ $? -ne 0 ]
> +then

Should be:

if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
   ....
fi

Which is the preferred style for fstests.

> +       support_noinode_cache="no"
> +       run_check _scratch_mount
> +fi
> +
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume create $SCRATCH_MNT/subv1
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume create $SCRATCH_MNT/subv2
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume create $SCRATCH_MNT/subv3
> +
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog quota enable $SCRATCH_MNT
> +_run_btrfs_util_prog quota rescan -w $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +# if we don't support noinode_cache mount option, then we should double check
> +# whether inode cache is enabled before executing the real test payload.
> +if [ $SUPPORT_NOINODE_CACHE == "no" ]; then
> +       EMPTY_SIZE=`$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG qgroup show $units $SCRATCH_MNT | \
> +               $SED_PROG -n '/[0-9]/p' | $AWK_PROG '{print $2}' | head -n1`
> +       if [ $EMPTY_SIZE != $NODESIZE ]; then
> +               _notrun "Kernel doesn't support to disable inode cache"
> +       fi
> +fi
> +
> +dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/subv1/file1 bs=4K count=64 2>> $seqres.full

Sorry I didn't ask in previous versions of the patch, but is dd really
necessary here for some reason? Wouldn't the following work:

$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 0 256K" $SCRATCH_MNT/subv1/file1 | _filter_xfs_io

I tried your test, and using xfs_io worked as well here.

> +cp --reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/subv1/file1 $SCRATCH_MNT/subv2/file1
> +cp --reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/subv1/file1 $SCRATCH_MNT/subv3/file1
> +
> +# Current btrfs use tree search ioctl to show quota, which will only show info
> +# in commit tree. So need to sync to update the qgroup commit tree.
> +sync
> +
> +units=`_btrfs_qgroup_units`
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG qgroup show $units $SCRATCH_MNT | $SED_PROG -n '/[0-9]/p' | \
> +       $AWK_PROG '{print $2" "$3}'
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/089.out b/tests/btrfs/089.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..09a1077
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/089.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +QA output created by 089
> +65536 65536
> +327680 65536
> +327680 65536
> +327680 65536
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index a053d14..82f6fe6 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -90,3 +90,4 @@
>  085 auto quick metadata subvol
>  086 auto quick clone
>  088 auto quick
> +089 auto quick qgroup
> --
> 2.3.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Filipe David Manana,

"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-07  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-07  9:04 [PATCH RESEND 1/2] fstests: btrfs/088: Check return value of "btrfs filesystem show" command executed on umounted device Qu Wenruo
2015-04-07  9:04 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND 2/2] fstests: btrfs/089: Test for incorrect exclusive refernce number after file clone Qu Wenruo
2015-04-07  9:52   ` Filipe David Manana [this message]
2015-04-08  1:04     ` Qu Wenruo
2015-04-07  9:25 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] fstests: btrfs/088: Check return value of "btrfs filesystem show" command executed on umounted device Filipe David Manana

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAL3q7H5JF9hRFBasU1DyW0uoW3MQ0tbByjEMru-KmbKp7Was4A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).