From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:62241 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751801Ab2HTSI4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:08:56 -0400 Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so5607941vbb.19 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:08:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20120401152749.61790@gmx.net> <2272893.XFoXOC5Zif@bursa22> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:08:55 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cross-subvolume cp --reflink From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgUG91bGlu?= To: linux-btrfs , james northrup Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, james northrup wrote: > > dunno if this thread is dead, but im inclined to patch in cp --reflink to "fdupes" prog. > It currently does provide a poor-man's dedupe via md5sum and hardlink, or delete. > > all the better if the distro-kernels can backport cross-snapshot reflinks sooner than later. > I was also wondering if it is possible for a program like fdupes to use BTRFS checksum to make searching for duplicates much faster as you wouldn't need to calculate checksum if BTRFS own checksum was mismatched between 2 groups of checksum blocks?