linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Unstable v3.15-rc tags
@ 2014-07-05 14:10 WorMzy Tykashi
  2014-07-22 14:15 ` David Sterba
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: WorMzy Tykashi @ 2014-07-05 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dsterba, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org

Hi David,

The v3.15-rc{2,3,4} tags seem to have disappeared from the unstable
repo in the last day or so. Please could you re-push the tags, or were
they removed for a reason?

Cheers,


WorMzy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Unstable v3.15-rc tags
  2014-07-05 14:10 Unstable v3.15-rc tags WorMzy Tykashi
@ 2014-07-22 14:15 ` David Sterba
  2014-07-23 16:04   ` WorMzy Tykashi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Sterba @ 2014-07-22 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: WorMzy Tykashi; +Cc: dsterba, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 03:10:17PM +0100, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> The v3.15-rc{2,3,4} tags seem to have disappeared from the unstable
> repo in the last day or so. Please could you re-push the tags, or were
> they removed for a reason?

The tags were meant to mark the points in time where different groups of
patches were added to the to-be-v3.15, but then I noticed that one of
the patches had my note in the subject and Qu sent an updated version
anyway. So I had rebased the branch and all the tags became stale. I did
not bother to move them as they did not work as expected.

The patch flux is the good and bad habit of the integration repository.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Unstable v3.15-rc tags
  2014-07-22 14:15 ` David Sterba
@ 2014-07-23 16:04   ` WorMzy Tykashi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: WorMzy Tykashi @ 2014-07-23 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dsterba, WorMzy Tykashi, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org

On 22 July 2014 15:15, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
> The tags were meant to mark the points in time where different groups of
> patches were added to the to-be-v3.15, but then I noticed that one of
> the patches had my note in the subject and Qu sent an updated version
> anyway. So I had rebased the branch and all the tags became stale. I did
> not bother to move them as they did not work as expected.

Ah, thanks for clarifying. I wasn't particularly attached to the tags,
it just seemed odd that we got to rc4, then dropped back down to rc1.
I'll not pay too much attention to them in future.

>
> The patch flux is the good and bad habit of the integration repository.

It certainly makes for an interesting chart in gitk --all. :-D

Cheers,


WorMzy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-23 16:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-05 14:10 Unstable v3.15-rc tags WorMzy Tykashi
2014-07-22 14:15 ` David Sterba
2014-07-23 16:04   ` WorMzy Tykashi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).