From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]:48255 "EHLO
	mail-vc0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751374Ab3LKR3z (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:29:55 -0500
Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id lh4so5865919vcb.37
        for <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:29:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20131211163704.GI10658@twin.jikos.cz>
References: <CALOYprXUt5DqRHWX0jvF8t3mLssiHVW46bXF7gW930hfyMuDUw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20131211163704.GI10658@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:29:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CALOYprXLotFEB8a8CEkmd2UL1zRPqsUBj+01J3upmzKbY47==w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: btrfs-progs integration branch versioning
From: WorMzy Tykashi <wormzy.tykashi@gmail.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, WorMzy Tykashi <wormzy.tykashi@gmail.com>,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 11 December 2013 16:37, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I haven't pushed the tags, fixed now. The repos are mostly
> identical to increase availability.
>
> david

Cheers for that.


WorMzy