From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:35965 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbdGaVHg (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:07:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id t201so1279594wmt.1 for ; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:07:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <21425367.VGcO8ck7Vu@merkaba> References: <20170501170641.GG3516@merlins.org> <20170707163834.GA6083@merlins.org> <20170709043417.GE6704@merlins.org> <21425367.VGcO8ck7Vu@merkaba> From: Ivan Sizov Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 00:07:14 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0) To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: Marc MERLIN , Lu Fengqi , Btrfs BTRFS , David Sterba , Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2017-07-09 10:57 GMT+03:00 Martin Steigerwald : > Hello Marc. > > Marc MERLIN - 08.07.17, 21:34: >> Sigh, >> >> This is now the 3rd filesystem I have (on 3 different machines) that is >> getting corruption of some kind (on 4.11.6). > > Anyone else getting corruptions with 4.11? Yes, a lot. There are at least 3 cases, probably I've missed something. https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg67177.html https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg67681.html https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/369133/dealing-with-btrfs-ref-backpointer-mismatches-backref-missing/369275 If an additional debug info is needed, I'm ready to provide it. -- Ivan Sizov