btrfs-progs 0.20rc1.1, linux 3.7.6 - new filesystem: failed to recover relocation

btrfs-progs 0.20rc1.1, linux 3.7.6 - new filesystem: failed to recover relocation

[Sjon Hortensius]

I have just completed installing an archlinux machine with 2 btrfs
partitions, one works fine (the rootfs), the other one I cannot mount.
Even after recreating the filesystem I still cannot mount it. I
receive te following output in my dmesg:

[ 6526.037089] device fsid 74cc8eb8-f60a-4797-9ab3-0c8ac4fe847f devid
1 transid 3 /dev/vdb1
[ 6526.037763] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
[ 6526.038415] btrfs: failed to recover relocation
[ 6526.039716] btrfs: open_ctree failed

this is on a virtual machine using libvirt, a virtio hdd and kvm;
btrfsck reports no errors. An image of this filesystem can be found
here: http://home.react.nl/~sjon/bug-reports/btrfs/btrfs-failed-to-recover-relocation
(29 KiB)

After recreating the same filesystem again on a smaller (100Mb)
filesystem btrfsck reports:

Check tree block failed, want=139264, have=0
Check tree block failed, want=139264, have=0
Check tree block failed, want=139264, have=0
read block failed check_tree_block
Couldn't read chunk root

and btrfs-image segfaults on this. I have dumped the partition with
dd, it can be found here:
http://home.react.nl/~sjon/bug-reports/btrfs/vdb1.raw.gz (98 KiB).

I couldn't find any recent reports mentioning these sort of problems.

Thanks,
Sjon Hortensius

Re: btrfs-progs 0.20rc1.1, linux 3.7.6 - new filesystem: failed to recover relocation

[David Sterba]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:09:56PM +0100, Sjon Hortensius wrote:
> I have just completed installing an archlinux machine with 2 btrfs
> partitions, one works fine (the rootfs), the other one I cannot mount.
> Even after recreating the filesystem I still cannot mount it. I
> receive te following output in my dmesg:
> 
> [ 6526.037089] device fsid 74cc8eb8-f60a-4797-9ab3-0c8ac4fe847f devid
> 1 transid 3 /dev/vdb1
> [ 6526.037763] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
> [ 6526.038415] btrfs: failed to recover relocation
> [ 6526.039716] btrfs: open_ctree failed

What was the size of the filesystem?

> btrfsck reports no errors. An image of this filesystem can be found
> here: http://home.react.nl/~sjon/bug-reports/btrfs/btrfs-failed-to-recover-relocation
> (29 KiB)

Restoring the image produces a 4MB file, which is kind of too small,
there's a patch for mkfs to prevent creating such a fs. I'll get to
adding it to progs integration soon.

david

Re: btrfs-progs 0.20rc1.1, linux 3.7.6 - new filesystem: failed to recover relocation

[Sjon Hortensius]

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:27 PM, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:09:56PM +0100, Sjon Hortensius wrote:
>> I have just completed installing an archlinux machine with 2 btrfs
>> partitions, one works fine (the rootfs), the other one I cannot mount.
>> Even after recreating the filesystem I still cannot mount it. I
>> receive te following output in my dmesg:
>>
>> [ 6526.037089] device fsid 74cc8eb8-f60a-4797-9ab3-0c8ac4fe847f devid
>> 1 transid 3 /dev/vdb1
>> [ 6526.037763] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
>> [ 6526.038415] btrfs: failed to recover relocation
>> [ 6526.039716] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>
> What was the size of the filesystem?

The first filesystem (of which I created the image) was ~ 20 GiB; the
dd dump is from a 100 MiB partition.

>> btrfsck reports no errors. An image of this filesystem can be found
>> here: http://home.react.nl/~sjon/bug-reports/btrfs/btrfs-failed-to-recover-relocation
>> (29 KiB)
>
> Restoring the image produces a 4MB file, which is kind of too small,
> there's a patch for mkfs to prevent creating such a fs. I'll get to
> adding it to progs integration soon.
>
> david

While debugging this my vm-host began throwing segfaults as well, so I
think this problem was caused by something else (namely this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893854).

Thanks anyway.

Re: btrfs-progs 0.20rc1.1, linux 3.7.6 - new filesystem: failed to recover relocation

[Sjon Hortensius]

After converting all my raw images to qcow2 the host no longer
segfaults, but I still get a corrupted btrfs filesystem. Please have a
look at this new image at
http://home.react.nl/~sjon/bug-reports/btrfs/btrfs-corrupt.qcow2.gz
(16 KiB) It contains a 20 GiB disk with 1 partition that btrfsck
(again) has no problems with, but I cannot mount it.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Sjon Hortensius <Sjon@hortensius.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:27 PM, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:09:56PM +0100, Sjon Hortensius wrote:
>>> I have just completed installing an archlinux machine with 2 btrfs
>>> partitions, one works fine (the rootfs), the other one I cannot mount.
>>> Even after recreating the filesystem I still cannot mount it. I
>>> receive te following output in my dmesg:
>>>
>>> [ 6526.037089] device fsid 74cc8eb8-f60a-4797-9ab3-0c8ac4fe847f devid
>>> 1 transid 3 /dev/vdb1
>>> [ 6526.037763] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
>>> [ 6526.038415] btrfs: failed to recover relocation
>>> [ 6526.039716] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>>
>> What was the size of the filesystem?
>
> The first filesystem (of which I created the image) was ~ 20 GiB; the
> dd dump is from a 100 MiB partition.
>
>>> btrfsck reports no errors. An image of this filesystem can be found
>>> here: http://home.react.nl/~sjon/bug-reports/btrfs/btrfs-failed-to-recover-relocation
>>> (29 KiB)
>>
>> Restoring the image produces a 4MB file, which is kind of too small,
>> there's a patch for mkfs to prevent creating such a fs. I'll get to
>> adding it to progs integration soon.
>>
>> david
>
> While debugging this my vm-host began throwing segfaults as well, so I
> think this problem was caused by something else (namely this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893854).
>
> Thanks anyway.