From: ZhengYuan Huang <gality369@gmail.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz
Cc: dsterba@suse.com, clm@fb.com, idryomov@gmail.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@gmail.com, r33s3n6@gmail.com, zzzccc427@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: fix balance NULL derefs and chunk/bg mapping verification
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 10:53:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOmEq9WErj1uq-0ARmnJWMC9byNJD6g2cOAxYOphHjTkwxzpBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260323173340.GM5735@twin.jikos.cz>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 1:33 AM David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> wrote:
> As I understand it you're using some advanced fuzzing tool (patch 1
> mentions runtime fuzzing), so the errors would not normally happen. With
> fuzzing it depends on the capabilities, at runtime it is possible to
> confuse the filesystem so much that sipmle checks can't detect it.
>
> Here checking if block group lookups are ok makes sense in general.
> There are existing checks that seem to be following the same logic like
> in unpin_extent_range().
Thanks for your review.
Yes, we are using an in-house runtime fuzzing tool.
However, after further investigation of this bug, we found that it is
not limited to fuzzing-only scenarios. The issue can be reliably
triggered by using a crafted filesystem image together with normal syscalls.
So this may not be purely a fuzzing artifact, but rather a potential
robustness issue that could be hit in practice.
> This is good, thanks. For simple fixes or cleanups it's fine to
> make a vague reference to the main patch or a "in the previous/followup
> patches".
Thanks for the guidance, I’ll continue to follow this convention for
changelogs.
Thanks,
ZhengYuan Huang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-14 12:37 [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: fix balance NULL derefs and chunk/bg mapping verification ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] btrfs: balance: fix null-ptr-deref in chunk_usage_filter ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-23 17:40 ` David Sterba
2026-03-24 2:56 ` ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] btrfs: balance: fix null-ptr-deref in chunk_usage_range_filter ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-14 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] btrfs: fix check_chunk_block_group_mappings() to actually iterate all chunks ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-23 17:52 ` David Sterba
2026-03-24 2:57 ` ZhengYuan Huang
2026-03-23 17:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] btrfs: fix balance NULL derefs and chunk/bg mapping verification David Sterba
2026-03-24 2:53 ` ZhengYuan Huang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOmEq9WErj1uq-0ARmnJWMC9byNJD6g2cOAxYOphHjTkwxzpBg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gality369@gmail.com \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r33s3n6@gmail.com \
--cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox