Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

[Jesper Utoft]

Hello everybody.

I have run into serious trouble with my btrfs volume.

As an example after adding two disks to a btrfs volume they show up as
filled with data in btrfs filesystem show.

In btrfs fi df /mnt it says
Data RAID1: total=4.64TB, used=11.46TB
System.. (total > used so i think it is fine)
Metadata, Rid1: total=9.00GB, used=18.33GB

Obviously something have gone wrong
I have currently no idea on what to do.
I have tried running btrfsck but that didn't do anything.

The system i ubuntu 13.04 live cd kernel 3.8.0-19.

I have had trouble booting this server for a day's time, i end up in
initramfs with a mount issue.

Have anybody heard about something like this.
Please point me in the right direction :)

Thank you very much.
Cheers Jesper

"BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"

[Nick Gilmour]

Hi all,

I have converted .vdi disk (BTRFS) into a .img disk, resized it from
500GB to 150GB and then copied into a ZFS Volume. I've imported the VM
into VMM and it started normally but an upgrade failed. I've rebooted
and  got only a blue screen something like a BSOD on Windows. I've
changed into a terminal and now this error appears constantly:

 "BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"

I can stop it shortly with Ctrl-C and enter a command. With startx I
can see my desktop in blue  color with some icons in it and nothing
more.


uname -a
Linux VM-Ubuntu 4.4.0-83-generic

btrfs --version
btrfs-progs v4.4

btrfs fi show
Label: none uuid: x
           Total devices 1 FS bytes used 473.68GiB
            devid 1 size 492.00 GiB used 492.00GiB path /dev/sda1

Label: 'extra' uuid: y
           Total devices 1 FS bytes used 112.00KiB
            devid 1 size 100.00 GiB used 2.02GiB path /dev/sdb1

btrfs fi df /home
Data, single: total=106.40GiB, used=96.42GiB
System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=48.00KiB
Metadata, DUP: total=14.88GiB, used=11.18GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00 MiB, used=0.00B

dmesg > dmesg.log
compiz: segfault at ... error 4 in libnux-graphics-4.0.so...


Any ideas?

Regards,
Nick

Re: "BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"

[Liu Bo]

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:25:17PM +0200, Nick Gilmour wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have converted .vdi disk (BTRFS) into a .img disk, resized it from
> 500GB to 150GB and then copied into a ZFS Volume. I've imported the VM
> into VMM and it started normally but an upgrade failed. I've rebooted
> and  got only a blue screen something like a BSOD on Windows. I've
> changed into a terminal and now this error appears constantly:
> 
>  "BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"

The error implies that it failed to read the sectors which contains
btrfs superblock, given you've shrinked the size, I guess btrfs
doesn't know that somehow and is trying to issue writes to a >150GB
position(could be 256G).

You can check that 'bytenr x'.

Which command did you use to resize it?

thanks,

-liubo

> 
> I can stop it shortly with Ctrl-C and enter a command. With startx I
> can see my desktop in blue  color with some icons in it and nothing
> more.
> 
> 
> uname -a
> Linux VM-Ubuntu 4.4.0-83-generic
> 
> btrfs --version
> btrfs-progs v4.4
> 
> btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: x
>            Total devices 1 FS bytes used 473.68GiB
>             devid 1 size 492.00 GiB used 492.00GiB path /dev/sda1
> 
> Label: 'extra' uuid: y
>            Total devices 1 FS bytes used 112.00KiB
>             devid 1 size 100.00 GiB used 2.02GiB path /dev/sdb1
> 
> btrfs fi df /home
> Data, single: total=106.40GiB, used=96.42GiB
> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=48.00KiB
> Metadata, DUP: total=14.88GiB, used=11.18GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00 MiB, used=0.00B
> 
> dmesg > dmesg.log
> compiz: segfault at ... error 4 in libnux-graphics-4.0.so...
> 
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Regards,
> Nick
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: "BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"

[Nick Gilmour]

Thanks for the reply!

For conversion I used this command:
$ vboxmanage internalcommands converttoraw mydisk.vdi mydisk.img

and for resizing this one:
$ qemu-img resize mydisk.img 150G

Is there something I can do to fix this or another way to do the
resizing without getting an error?

Regards,
Nick


On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:25:17PM +0200, Nick Gilmour wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have converted .vdi disk (BTRFS) into a .img disk, resized it from
>> 500GB to 150GB and then copied into a ZFS Volume. I've imported the VM
>> into VMM and it started normally but an upgrade failed. I've rebooted
>> and  got only a blue screen something like a BSOD on Windows. I've
>> changed into a terminal and now this error appears constantly:
>>
>>  "BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"
>
> The error implies that it failed to read the sectors which contains
> btrfs superblock, given you've shrinked the size, I guess btrfs
> doesn't know that somehow and is trying to issue writes to a >150GB
> position(could be 256G).
>
> You can check that 'bytenr x'.
>
> Which command did you use to resize it?
>
> thanks,
>
> -liubo
>
>>
>> I can stop it shortly with Ctrl-C and enter a command. With startx I
>> can see my desktop in blue  color with some icons in it and nothing
>> more.
>>
>>
>> uname -a
>> Linux VM-Ubuntu 4.4.0-83-generic
>>
>> btrfs --version
>> btrfs-progs v4.4
>>
>> btrfs fi show
>> Label: none uuid: x
>>            Total devices 1 FS bytes used 473.68GiB
>>             devid 1 size 492.00 GiB used 492.00GiB path /dev/sda1
>>
>> Label: 'extra' uuid: y
>>            Total devices 1 FS bytes used 112.00KiB
>>             devid 1 size 100.00 GiB used 2.02GiB path /dev/sdb1
>>
>> btrfs fi df /home
>> Data, single: total=106.40GiB, used=96.42GiB
>> System, DUP: total=8.00MiB, used=48.00KiB
>> Metadata, DUP: total=14.88GiB, used=11.18GiB
>> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00 MiB, used=0.00B
>>
>> dmesg > dmesg.log
>> compiz: segfault at ... error 4 in libnux-graphics-4.0.so...
>>
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nick
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: "BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"

[Chris Murphy]

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Nick Gilmour <nickeforos@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> For conversion I used this command:
> $ vboxmanage internalcommands converttoraw mydisk.vdi mydisk.img
>
> and for resizing this one:
> $ qemu-img resize mydisk.img 150G
>
> Is there something I can do to fix this or another way to do the
> resizing without getting an error?

I don't see a 'btrfs filesystem resize' command in your sequence. Did
you actually resize the file system before you resized the underlying
(virtual) block device?



>>> btrfs fi show
>>> Label: none uuid: x
>>>            Total devices 1 FS bytes used 473.68GiB
>>>             devid 1 size 492.00 GiB used 492.00GiB path /dev/sda1

Is this before or after the resize?




-- 
Chris Murphy

Re: "BTRFS error (device vda1): couldn't get super buffer head for bytenr x"

[Chris Murphy]

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Nick Gilmour <nickeforos@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't see a 'btrfs filesystem resize' command in your sequence. Did
>> you actually resize the file system before you resized the underlying
>> (virtual) block device?
>
>
> OK. I guess, this is it. I didn't do any 'btrfs filesystem resize' . The
> guides I was following didn't mention something like that. I was assuming
> that if it works for other FS like this it should also work for BTRFS.

Literally all other file systems require the fs be resized first when
shrinking, before the underlying partition or virtual block device is
reduced. There is nothing unique about Btrfs in this respect.

Some tools will use fsadm in the sequence to make sure the file system
is properly resized. So the question is whether any of the resize
tools you did use, expect to use fsadm. And if they do or did, whether
and why there wasn't an error if fsadm doesn't support Btrfs before
the block device was resized anyway. I don't know offhand if Btrfs is
supported by fsadmn, the man page does not list it as one of the
supported file systems.



> # btrfs filesystem resize -350g /home ?
>
> Should it be before or after I shrink the .img?

When shrinking, the fs resize must happen first. Then the block device
can be reduced to match.

When growing, the block device is extended, then the fs is resized.




-- 
Chris Murphy

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

[Nick Gilmour]

Thanks for the detailed description!

It makes all sense. My question was rather stupid.

I shrunk the partition with gparted (I suppose it uses the btrfs
resize command) and then cloned the partition with clonezilla. I tried
to create a zvol of the same size but I got an error about the size (I
don't remember exactly), so I used qemu to expand the img. Then
imported the zvol into VMM and started the VM but I got again a blue
screen with the same error. After that I gave up and created a new VM.

Regards,
Nick

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
<mailer-daemon@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Message may contain a virus
>
> Your message wasn't delivered to linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org because it may
> contain a virus. Learn how to check for and prevent viruses.
> The response from the remote server was:
>
> 550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The message contains HTML subpart,
> therefore we consider it SPAM or Outlook Virus. TEXT/PLAIN is accepted.!
> BF:<U 0.499737>; S1751350AbdJLLKl
>
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.7.1
> Remote-MTA: dns; vger.kernel.org. (209.132.180.67, the server for the domain
> vger.kernel.org.)
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The message
> contains HTML subpart, therefore we consider it SPAM or Outlook Virus.
> TEXT/PLAIN is accepted.! BF:<U 0.499737>; S1751350AbdJLLKl
> Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 04:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
>