From: shally verma <shallyvermacavium@gmail.com>
To: Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"Verma, Shally" <shally.verma@cavium.com>
Subject: Re: using fio to test btrfs compression
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:43:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP9W88hrM+9vPTL=RFXC9+VdWSLMvM1UAtR+XX89FcvorYLqvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGqmi75wKaxpJNO6HfjUJZU4tESQA-r_4rTfe7MY9KW5C67JaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-09-20 11:59 GMT+03:00 shally verma <shallyvermacavium@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2017-09-20 11:44 GMT+03:00 shally verma <shallyvermacavium@gmail.com>:
>>>> One more catch... I am initiating fio from non-btrfs filesystem i.e.
>>>> pwd is ext4 based fs where as mount point is btrfs.
>>>> Could that make difference?
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Shally
>>>
>>> Only matter are where you store test file =)
>>> If you store test file on btrfs, pwd does nothing.
>>>
>>
>> Then steps listed in previous mail should work right? Am listing them
>> again here:
>>
>> " ----
>>>
>>> 1. mount -t btrfs -o compress-force=zlib /dev/sdb1 mnt
>>>
>>> 2. fio --directory=mnt/ --numjobs=1 --direct=0 --buffered=1 --bs=64k
>>> --rw=write --iodepth=128 --name=test --size=1G
>>> --buffer_compress_percentage=100 --buffer_pattern=0xFF --refill_buffer
>>> --ioengine=libaio
>>>
>>> 1GN file written uncompressed. Here no compression invoked (though
>>> compress-force=zlib)
>>>
>>> 3. cp mnt/test ./ --> copy back fio generated test file from btrfs
>>> mount point to local drive
>>>
>>> 4. hex dump test file (all FFs) -- confirmed that data is compressible
>>> no random data.
>>>
>>> 5. cp test mnt/ --> now, copy same test again back to mount point
>>> (reverse of step 3) . Now, here I see during copying compression is
>>> invoked.
>>>
>>> I am using kernel 4.9 and compress-foce is said to be working for
>>> kernel > 2.13 from wiki ... so I wonder what's so special with cp
>>> command which is not happening during fio writes???
>>
>> "-----
>>
>> Thanks
>> Shally
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> Have a nice day,
>>> Timofey.
>
> I did try reproduce your problem on 4.14, i'm hard to explain that
> happens and why file created by FIO will not use compression.
>
> Suggest workaround:
> rm -v /mnt/test.0.0
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test.0.0 bs=1M count=1024
You mean "compression" using "dd" write.
> fio --directory=$HOME/test/ --numjobs=1 --direct=1 --buffered=0
> --bs=64k --rw=write --iodepth=128 --name=test --size=1G
> --buffer_compress_percentage=100 --buffer_pattern=0xFF --refill_buffer
> --ioengine=libaio
You mean "no compression" during fio writes and you see similar behavior as I?
BTW here --direct=0 and --buffered = 1.
>
> You can check if data compressed by filefrag -v /mnt/test.0.0 (you
> will see encoded extents)
>
if I do filefrag on mnt/test.0.0, then it shows up like this:
ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags:
0: 0.. 1: 1329922.. 1329923: 2:
1: 2.. 3: 1329923.. 1329924: 2: 1329924:
2: 4.. 5: 1329924.. 1329925: 2: 1329925:
An new to this, how does it says extents are encoded here?
Thanks
Shally
> --
> Have a nice day,
> Timofey.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-18 7:36 using fio to test btrfs compression shally verma
2017-09-18 8:26 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-18 13:28 ` shally verma
2017-09-18 13:41 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-20 8:36 ` shally verma
2017-09-20 8:44 ` shally verma
2017-09-20 8:55 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-20 8:59 ` shally verma
2017-09-20 9:36 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-20 10:13 ` shally verma [this message]
2017-09-20 10:30 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-20 11:10 ` shally verma
2017-09-21 11:42 ` Duncan
[not found] ` <CAGqmi74eviuSf=LL7sGEJnH1YYqu_pHdaGDvq4Qdr4aSpvqxkQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-09-22 5:33 ` shally verma
2017-09-22 17:05 ` Timofey Titovets
2017-09-21 15:26 ` Liu Bo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP9W88hrM+9vPTL=RFXC9+VdWSLMvM1UAtR+XX89FcvorYLqvQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=shallyvermacavium@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nefelim4ag@gmail.com \
--cc=shally.verma@cavium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).