From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olivier Doucet <webmaster@ajeux.com>
Subject: Re: BTRFS Benchmarking
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 20:42:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPPqfY2zXkd0Qgd-UX5uaaWOF9vaeEs5yqo04SD9hjwmfGUq5Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPPqfY0iGPjRDC0YG814uiv4+9jLU54w6D5Yh=okTqG7VtwXOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120504160749.GA1915@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120504160749.GA1915@localhost.localdomain>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

> Not what I've been seeing at all, but we've been working a lot in thi=
s area
> recently. =A0Please retest with btrfs-next. =A0Thanks,

Hi,

I tested again with kernel 3.3.4 ; I wondered if latest btrfs code is
present in this release or not.

Results are very similar with 3.3.4 compared to 3.3.0

Olivier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html