From: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
To: WenRuo Qu <wqu@suse.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"fstests@vger.kernel.org" <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/253: fix false alert due to _set_fs_sysfs_attr changes
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 07:00:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D9C4F4DRFD6F.1PCSE73DVIV8Y@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250420083817.231610-1-wqu@suse.com>
On Sun Apr 20, 2025 at 5:38 PM JST, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> [FALSE FAILURE]
> Test btrfs/253 now fails like the following:
>
> btrfs/253 2s ... - output mismatch (see ~/xfstests/results//btrfs/253.out.bad)
> --- tests/btrfs/253.out 2022-05-11 11:25:30.753333331 +0930
> +++ ~/xfstests/results//btrfs/253.out.bad 2025-04-20 17:28:39.139180394 +0930
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> Calculate request size so last memory allocation cannot be completely fullfilled.
> Third allocation.
> Force allocation of system block type must fail.
> +./common/rc: line 5213: echo: write error: No space left on device
> Verify first allocation.
> Verify second allocation.
> Verify third allocation.
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u ~/xfstests/tests/btrfs/253.out ~/xfstests/results//btrfs/253.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
>
> [CAUSE]
> Since commit 0a9011ae6a36 ("fstests: common/rc: set_fs_sysfs_attr:
> redirect errors to stdout") the function _set_fs_sysfs_attr() always
> output everything into stdout, thus the stderr redirection makes no
> sense anymore.
>
> And the expected failure will cause output difference and fail the test.
>
> [FIX]
> Instead of the useless re-direct of stderr, save the stdout and check if
> it contains the word "error" to determine if it failed.
>
> Fixes: 0a9011ae6a36 ("fstests: common/rc: set_fs_sysfs_attr: redirect errors to stdout")
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
> tests/btrfs/253 | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/253 b/tests/btrfs/253
> index adbc6bfb..ad69dfe1 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/253
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/253
> @@ -228,7 +228,12 @@ alloc_size "Data" FOURTH_DATA_SIZE_MB
> # Force chunk allocation of system block type must fail.
> #
> echo "Force allocation of system block type must fail."
> -_set_fs_sysfs_attr ${SCRATCH_BDEV} allocation/system/force_chunk_alloc 1 2>/dev/null
> +output=$(_set_fs_sysfs_attr ${SCRATCH_BDEV} allocation/system/force_chunk_alloc 1)
> +
> +if ! echo "$output" | grep -q "error" ; then
> + echo "Force allocation succeeded unexpectedly."
> + echo "$output" >> $seqres.full
> +fi
Can't we use _set_sysfs_policy_must_fail() instead? Apparently, that
function does not looks only for "policy" setting. So, renaming the
function would also be appreciated.
>
> #
> # Verification of initial allocation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-21 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-20 8:38 [PATCH] fstests: btrfs/253: fix false alert due to _set_fs_sysfs_attr changes Qu Wenruo
2025-04-21 7:00 ` Naohiro Aota [this message]
2025-04-21 7:57 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D9C4F4DRFD6F.1PCSE73DVIV8Y@wdc.com \
--to=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox