From: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>,
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/9] btrfs: zoned: do not select metadata BG as finish target
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:34:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB1OGYV2ZD45.1V4529LQ35FDH@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aF6B2CJpduXwbdyh@infradead.org>
On Fri Jun 27, 2025 at 8:34 PM JST, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:19:06AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
>>
>> We call btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg() to zone finish one block group and make
>> a room to activate another block group. Currently, we can choose a metadata
>> block group as a target. But, as we reserve an active metadata block group,
>> we no longer want to select a metadata block group. So, skip it in the
>> loop.
>
> Q: why do you finish a currently open zone to start with? If you add
> an extra zones worth of over provisioning, you have enough slack to
> always be able to fill to the advertized capacity, and never need to
> finish an open zone before it is fully filled. Which simplifies the
> implementation and reduces P/E cycles.
Basically, this is called when data extent allocation cannot activate a
new zone, so the number of active zones == max active zones. In this
case, it first call btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg() to try to finish a zone
with minimum free space. If it succeeds, we can allocate new block group
and allocate an extent from there. Or, it retries the allocation with a
smaller size. So, it just prefers zone finishing than filling with a
fragmented allocation.
Another usage is when it writes to metadata. While we reserve zones for
metadata, this can be an escape hatch to finish some zones and make a
room for the new writing.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
>
> You'll also need to add your signoff here when sending the patch on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 9:19 [PATCH RFC 0/9] btrfs: zoned: fixes for garbage collection under preassure Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] btrfs: zoned: do not select metadata BG as finish target Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-02 15:34 ` Naohiro Aota [this message]
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] btrfs: zoned: get rid of relocation_bg_lock Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] btrfs: zoned: get rid of treelog_bg_lock Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] btrfs: zoned: don't hold space_info lock on zoned allocation Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] btrfs: remove delalloc_root_mutex Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 12:42 ` Filipe Manana
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] btrfs: remove btrfs_root's delalloc_mutex Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 12:30 ` Filipe Manana
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] btrfs: lower auto-reclaim message log level Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 11:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] btrfs: lower log level of relocation messages Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 11:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-30 17:12 ` David Sterba
2025-07-01 5:09 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-07-01 14:43 ` David Sterba
2025-06-27 9:19 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] btrfs: remove unused bgs on allocation failure Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-27 11:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-30 11:45 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2025-06-30 12:05 ` Filipe Manana
2025-06-27 12:14 ` Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB1OGYV2ZD45.1V4529LQ35FDH@wdc.com \
--to=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox