From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:54351 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754942AbaAUSD2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:03:28 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w10so3236748pde.34 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.10.160] (206.214.244.2.epikip.net. [206.214.244.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pe3sm14409874pbc.23.2014.01.21.10.03.27 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:03:27 -0800 (PST) From: Graham Fleming Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: RE: Scrubbing with BTRFS Raid 5 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:03:26 -0800 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Thanks again for the added info; very helpful. I want to keep playing around with BTRFSS RAID 5 and testing with it... assuming I have a drive with bad blocks, or let's say some inconsistent parity am I right in assuming that a) a btrfs scrub operation will not fix the stripes with bad parity and b) a balance operation will not be successful? Or would a balance operation work to re-write parity?