From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB82C433FE for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229622AbiKOUBp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:01:45 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50882 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230457AbiKOUBm (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:01:42 -0500 Received: from zmcc-3-mx.zmailcloud.com (zmcc-3-mx.zmailcloud.com [34.200.143.36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB9E29377 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmcc-3.zmailcloud.com (183.87.154.104.bc.googleusercontent.com [104.154.87.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zmcc-3-mx.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 971AF4054C; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:05:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from zmcc-3.zmailcloud.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmcc-3-mta-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639FA80366A2; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:01:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmcc-3-mta-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A1A80366A5; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:01:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from zmcc-3.zmailcloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmcc-3-mta-1.zmailcloud.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id zNmjD36PAJIc; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:01:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.4.2.11] (unknown [37.19.198.182]) by zmcc-3-mta-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C216C80366A2; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:01:38 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 15:01:29 -0500 From: Eric Levy Subject: Re: separate mailing list for patches? To: Christoph Anton Mitterer Cc: linux-btrfs Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4f3526771aa69fe275693aaa07e98e8e12452e99.camel@scientia.org> References: <0YIELR.GA2T7GBWR97P2@ericlevy.name> <20221115194744.6a343639@gecko.fritz.box> <48NELR.GD3GOBQRO8OC3@ericlevy.name> <4f3526771aa69fe275693aaa07e98e8e12452e99.camel@scientia.org> X-Mailer: geary/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 15 2022 at 08:56:53 PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > This however has also it's downsides (in particular for the users): > namely likely less attention by the developers ;-) Yes, if the developers subscribe only to one, and use it for all communication among themselves. As was my intended suggestion, I thought it might be helpful broadly, though perhaps very slightly less convenient for some, to put the patches on a dedicated channel, separate from one for the regular messages, containing written text for any purpose.