Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: brainchild@mailbox.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Understanding and resolving super mismatch error
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 15:38:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <M8L1FT.5SMPO3MM6WWR2@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <W4NDET.0Z0BXQT4DXWY2@mailbox.org>

I hope it is not objectionable that I bump my question, first asked 
several weeks ago.

I also hope someone might try to offer some answers or suggestions.

I would like to be able to use the file system normally and safely, by 
resolving the errors, and I know of no channels for such support other 
than the mailing list.

Thank you.

On Fri, May 1 2026 at 05:17:20 PM -04:00:00, brainchild@mailbox.org 
wrote:
> I would like to resize a Btrfs volume, as I normally would do through 
> Gparted.
> 
> Unfortunately, the check utility is reporting a problem:
> 
> ---
> [1/8] checking log skipped (none written)
> [2/8] checking root items
> [3/8] checking extents
> super bytes used 756613705728 mismatches actual used 753279578112
> ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
> [4/8] checking free space tree
> [5/8] checking fs roots
> [6/8] checking only csums items (without verifying data)
> [7/8] checking root refs
> [8/8] checking quota groups skipped (not enabled on this FS)
> Opening filesystem to check...
> Checking filesystem on /dev/nvme0n1p5
> UUID: bbac86e5-eaba-45bf-bbaa-c2494e11831a
> found 753279516672 bytes used, error(s) found
> total csum bytes: 483872008
> total tree bytes: 8971255808
> total fs tree bytes: 7809040384
> total extent tree bytes: 558678016
> btree space waste bytes: 1983819676
> file data blocks allocated: 12001362440192
> referenced 1022445051904
> ---
> 
> I tried to resolve using `rescue fix-device-size`, but the results 
> were unhelpful:
> 
> ----
> No device size related problem found
> ---
> 
> Gparted, as I recall, normally will not proceed to resize a partition 
> that fails basic checks.
> 
> More importantly, I do not want to proceed while the health of the 
> partition reduces the safety of the operation.
> 
> The system is using btrfs-progs version 6.6.3, though the check and 
> rescue operations were performed in a recovery environment using 
> version 6.17.1
> 
> Further information is reported below.
> 
> I would like some advice in regard to a few questions:
> 
> 1. Does the super mismatch indicate an elevated risk of loss during a 
> resize operation?
> 
> 2. How can the error be resolved, so that the check succeeds, and the 
> volume is fully healthy?
> 
> ---
> 
> $ uname -a
> Linux *** 7.0.2-070002-generic #202604271502 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon 
> Apr 27 15:35:55 UTC 2026 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> $ btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: bbac86e5-eaba-45bf-bbaa-c2494e11831a
> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 703.67GiB
> devid 1 size 831.26GiB used 723.38GiB path /dev/nvme0n1p5
> 
> $ btrfs fi df /
> Data, single: total=701.19GiB, used=692.17GiB
> System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=144.00KiB
> Metadata, DUP: total=11.06GiB, used=8.40GiB
> GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B
> 
> 
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-14 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01 21:17 Understanding and resolving super mismatch error brainchild
2026-05-14 19:38 ` brainchild [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=M8L1FT.5SMPO3MM6WWR2@mailbox.org \
    --to=brainchild@mailbox.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox