From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] btrfs; rename the disk_bytenr in strut btrfs_ordered_extent
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:01:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5oBek81Aepf84bZ@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213140849.GB24075@lst.de>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 03:08:49PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 01:58:06PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > /*
> > * These fields directly correspond to the same fields in
> > * btrfs_file_extent_item.
> > */
> >
> > which with this change is no longer true. Please update the comment
> > appropriately, other than that the change is reasonable to me, you can add
>
> Ok. Or should we skip this patch and stick to the on-disk naming
> even if it is a bit confusing?
My preference is to leave it, but generally for these things I defer to
outsiders, just because I'm used to it doesn't mean it's right. In this case
because it maps to the on-disk naming I'd rather leave it unless you feel
strongly. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-14 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-12 7:37 small btrfs-zoned fixlets and optimizations Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 7:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: use file_offset to limit bios size in calc_bio_boundaries Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 18:54 ` Josef Bacik
2022-12-13 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 7:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs; rename the disk_bytenr in strut btrfs_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 18:58 ` Josef Bacik
2022-12-13 14:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 17:01 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2022-12-12 7:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: set bbio->file_offset in alloc_new_bio Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 7:37 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: pass a btrfs_bio to btrfs_use_append Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 12:01 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-12 7:37 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: never return true for reads in btrfs_use_zone_append Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 12:02 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-12 7:37 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: don't rely on unchanging ->bi_bdev for zone append remaps Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 7:37 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: remove the bdev argument to btrfs_rmap_block Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-12 18:59 ` small btrfs-zoned fixlets and optimizations Josef Bacik
2023-02-09 20:13 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5oBek81Aepf84bZ@localhost.localdomain \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox